From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] string: fix potential seg fault on snprintf
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:36:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B02CF0DEA1@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53AD64D3.9000100@6wind.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 5:34 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] string: fix potential seg fault on snprintf
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> On 06/27/2014 02:13 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> > With last Thomas' patch, cmdline unit test does not pass due to this problem
> (basically it tests this situation).
> > After test passed, by fixing this issue in several functions, I looked for other
> places where this happened.
>
> Indeed I missed the unit test, thanks.
>
> I think that testing the NULL case is not required. To me, it is like
> testing snprintf(NULL, ...)
>
Famous last words include "that could never happen!" :-)
Since this is not a performance critical piece of code, it does not hurt to leave the Null-check in, and get the additional safety of checking for invalid inputs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 11:04 Pablo de Lara
2014-06-27 11:30 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-06-27 12:13 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-06-27 12:34 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-06-27 16:36 ` Richardson, Bruce [this message]
2014-06-30 7:41 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-06-30 16:48 ` Richardson, Bruce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B02CF0DEA1@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).