From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Cao, Min" <min.cao@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:11:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0343EAB17@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B6059B2012717B4390714544B1F509E110D591C2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cao, Min
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:08 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure
>
> Tested-by: Cao Min <Min.Cao@intel.com>
> This patch modifies the mbuf data struct, function and performace tests can
> work OK with it.
> It is ready to be integrated to dpdk.org.
>
Well, it's getting there. I need to rework and clean up the patches somewhat, taking account of the feedback received. 32-bit support also needs to be looked at more, too. However, I hope shortly to have non-RFC (i.e. v1 of N :-) ) versions of these patches ready to submit.
/Bruce
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 20:44 Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 01/14] mbuf: rename RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBUF_REFCNT Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 21:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-08-12 7:59 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-12 16:25 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/14] mbuf: remove rte_ctrlmbuf Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 8:27 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 03/14] mbuf: remove the rte_pktmbuf structure Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 8:38 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 04/14] mbuf: replace data pointer by an offset Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 8:55 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 05/14] mbuf: rename in_port to just port Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 9:00 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 06/14] mbuf: reorder fields by time-of-use Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 10:03 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 07/14] ixgbe: rework vector pmd following mbuf changes Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 08/14] mbuf: split mbuf across two cache lines Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 09/14] Fix performance regression due to moved pool ptr Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 11:28 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 10/14] mbuf: set next pointer to NULL on mbuf free Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 11/14] ixgbe: make mbuf_initializer queue variable global Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 21:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-08-11 22:03 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 12/14] ixgbe: Make vector stores unaligned Bruce Richardson
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 13/14] mbuf: cleanup + added in additional mbuf fields Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 14:18 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-11 20:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 14/14] ixgbe: Allow vector RX of scattered packets Bruce Richardson
2014-08-12 14:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure Olivier MATZ
2014-08-20 12:22 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-08-20 7:08 ` Cao, Min
2014-08-20 11:11 ` Richardson, Bruce [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0343EAB17@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=min.cao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).