Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure

["Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>]

Hi Olivier,

Sorry for the delayed reply. I haven't looked at those patches in detail yet, but from the description I imagine that those patch sets could then be put in following the mbuf rework that I'm looking at.

/Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:44 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure
> 
> Hi Bruce,
> 
> On 08/11/2014 10:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > This patch set expands and enhances the mbuf data structure. This set includes
> patches previously
> > submitted by Olivier to rework the mbuf, but takes the rework further than
> proposed there.
> >
> > NOTE: This is still a work in progress! Feedback at this stage is still welcome
> though.
> 
>  From the original series, I think the following ones could be
> added in a second patchset, do you agree?
> 
>   dpdk             igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation
>   dpdk             mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag
>   dpdk             testpmd: modify source address to validate checksum
>   dpdk             mbuf: generic support of TCP segmentation offload
>   dpdk             ixgbe: support TCP segmentation offload
>   virtio-net-pmd   pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure
>   vmxnet3-usermap  pmd: remove support of old dpdk versions
>   vmxnet3-usermap  pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure
>   memnic           pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure
> 
> Regards,
> Olivier