From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D405932
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:19:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2014 05:17:35 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,901,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="561062488"
Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2014 05:22:56 -0700
Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.112]) by
 IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001;
 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:22:55 +0100
From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure
Thread-Index: AQHPtaVqPD0g+WauukGv3H4+pbN/qJvM+5wAgAx7uPA=
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:22:55 +0000
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0343EAC9C@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1407789890-17355-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <53EA2828.7080005@6wind.com>
In-Reply-To: <53EA2828.7080005@6wind.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:19:59 -0000

Hi Olivier,

Sorry for the delayed reply. I haven't looked at those patches in detail ye=
t, but from the description I imagine that those patch sets could then be p=
ut in following the mbuf rework that I'm looking at.

/Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:44 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Extend the mbuf structure
>=20
> Hi Bruce,
>=20
> On 08/11/2014 10:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > This patch set expands and enhances the mbuf data structure. This set i=
ncludes
> patches previously
> > submitted by Olivier to rework the mbuf, but takes the rework further t=
han
> proposed there.
> >
> > NOTE: This is still a work in progress! Feedback at this stage is still=
 welcome
> though.
>=20
>  From the original series, I think the following ones could be
> added in a second patchset, do you agree?
>=20
>   dpdk             igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation
>   dpdk             mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag
>   dpdk             testpmd: modify source address to validate checksum
>   dpdk             mbuf: generic support of TCP segmentation offload
>   dpdk             ixgbe: support TCP segmentation offload
>   virtio-net-pmd   pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure
>   vmxnet3-usermap  pmd: remove support of old dpdk versions
>   vmxnet3-usermap  pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure
>   memnic           pmd: adapt to new rte_mbuf structure
>=20
> Regards,
> Olivier