From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Zhangkun (K)" <zhang.zhangkun@huawei.com>,
Masaru Oki <m-oki@stratosphere.co.jp>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Are there considerations about resource recycling by the process, not by the OS?
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:18:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0343EEDAF@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0FCB215400789046A95ECE23C3E46C515F958EFE@szxema505-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Can you perhaps send on the log and the traceback from the panic call. From the error message we may be able to tell you why your process is failing.
/Bruce
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhangkun (K)
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 4:40 AM
> To: Masaru Oki
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Are there considerations about resource recycling by the
> process, not by the OS?
>
> Hi,
> Yes, the program is running as root.
> I want to know if or not the DPDK Community considers about resource
> recycling.
>
> From: Masaru Oki [mailto:m-oki@stratosphere.co.jp]
> Date: 2014年9月5日 11:18
> To: Zhangkun (K)
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Are there considerations about resource recycling by the
> process, not by the OS?
>
> Hi,
>
> you may try
> $ gdb your_program
> gdb> b rte_panic
> gdb> run
> stopped at rte_panic
> gdb> bt
>
> sorry, it is not answer for your question.
> by the way, do you run the program as root?
>
>
> 2014-09-05 12:07 GMT+09:00 Zhangkun (K)
> <zhang.zhangkun@huawei.com<mailto:zhang.zhangkun@huawei.com>>:
> Hi,
> I develop the program with the use of dpdk and the process is core dump when
> the program is started.
> The process is crash in case of initing memory failed and calling rte_panic
> function.
> I search all rte_panic function in the dpdk, and find it so many. Therefore, in
> case the pr ocess happen fail,
> it will abort. The resource allocated before is not released by the process, but by
> the OS system.
> So I have a question: Are there considerations about resource recycling by the
> process, not by the OS ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 3:07 Zhangkun (K)
2014-09-05 3:17 ` Masaru Oki
2014-09-05 3:39 ` Zhangkun (K)
2014-09-05 8:18 ` Richardson, Bruce [this message]
2014-09-05 9:32 ` Tetsuya.Mukawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0343EEDAF@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=m-oki@stratosphere.co.jp \
--cc=zhang.zhangkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).