Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] app/test: create ring and ethdevs in pmd_ring_autotest

["Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:29 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] app/test: create ring and ethdevs in
> pmd_ring_autotest
> 
> Hi Bruce,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richardson, Bruce
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:14 PM
> > To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] app/test: create ring and ethdevs
> > in pmd_ring_autotest
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:20:46PM +0000, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > > Use command line option --vdev=eth_ring0 to create port 0.
> > > Create two rings and five ethdevs in test_pmd_ring for ports 1 to 5.
> > > Improve test output by adding the port number to printf statements,
> > > and adding a printf describing each test.
> > >
> > > revise ring-based PMD doc to match latest ring PMD code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> >
> > The doc changes are not relevant to the unit test fixes, so should be
> > in a separate patch. The test changes themselves are good though, and
> > actually makes the test runable without having to find a very specific
> > command-line incantation to make things work right.
> >
> > Subject to this being split into two:
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> Will I keep your ack on both patches when I split them?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bernard.
> 
Sure, feel free to.

/Bruce