From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD285F48 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:05:41 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2018 05:05:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,470,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="24444704" Received: from irsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.96]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2018 05:05:39 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.197]) by IRSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.108]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:05:38 +0000 From: "Richardson, Bruce" To: "Richardson, Bruce" , Medvedkin Vladimir CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] Add RIB library Thread-Index: AQHTq1hShKYP/4UmKEOVUSA72NsE9qPPsxkAgAAPf/A= Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:05:38 +0000 Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B0722561A7@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1519249495-16594-1-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com> <1519249495-16594-2-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com> <20180314110918.GA11720@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180314110918.GA11720@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] Add RIB library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:05:44 -0000 > > +/** RIB nodes allocation type */ > > +enum rte_rib_alloc_type { > > + RTE_RIB_MALLOC, > > + RTE_RIB_MEMPOOL, > > + RTE_RIB_ALLOC_MAX > > +}; >=20 > Not sure you need this any more. Malloc allocations and mempool > allocations are now pretty much the same thing. Sorry, please ignore this comment. I mistook mempool for memzone.