From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1FCDE0 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:30:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2014 08:27:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,631,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="436406696" Received: from orsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.8]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2014 08:31:05 -0800 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.203]) by ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.205]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:31:04 -0800 From: "Jayakumar, Muthurajan" To: Prashant Upadhyaya , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Query about this NIC Thread-Index: Ac8NUMKA2ZN8vUDPTMyOOsfrg4eUlQAAvmgAAAA0raAAAOI4QA== Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:31:03 +0000 Message-ID: <5D695A7F6F10504DBD9B9187395A21797C6CFA94@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <5D695A7F6F10504DBD9B9187395A21797C6CFA13@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Query about this NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:30:01 -0000 Both NICs should work under DPDK. The T2 variant is a 10GBase-T NIC and the= DA is a SFP based NIC. -----Original Message----- From: Prashant Upadhyaya [mailto:prashant.upadhyaya@aricent.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:07 AM To: Jayakumar, Muthurajan; dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: Query about this NIC Hi, No, I have not used X520-T2 before. If anybody on the list has used the above successfully, please advise. Jayant, I will await your advice. Regards -Prashant -----Original Message----- From: Jayakumar, Muthurajan [mailto:muthurajan.jayakumar@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:32 PM To: Prashant Upadhyaya; dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: Query about this NIC Hi Prashant, Thanks for using Intel DPDK. Intel DPDK supports X520-T2 (previously code named "Iron Pond") Will find out the differences between X520-T2 and X520-DA2 Server Adapter = E10G42BTDA PCIe Dual-Port 2xSFP+ Copper 10GSFP+Cu Low-Profile BTW, have you used X520-T2? Thank you, M Jay -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 7:39 AM To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] Query about this NIC Hi, Would the following NIC work with DPDK - Intel 10-Gigabit Ethernet X520-DA2 Server Adapter E10G42BTDA PCIe Dual-Port= 2xSFP+ Copper 10GSFP+Cu Low-Profile Regards -Prashant =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D