From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAD4159 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:25:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2014 15:21:58 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,761,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="503138296" Received: from orsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.132]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2014 15:26:37 -0700 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.44]) by ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.217]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:26:36 -0700 From: "Jayakumar, Muthurajan" To: Fred Pedrisa , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Core Performance Thread-Index: Ac9MY3seabeLD99gQTS78b+sD/eH2QAA1cRQ Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:26:36 +0000 Message-ID: <5D695A7F6F10504DBD9B9187395A21797C70338F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.139] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Core Performance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:25:04 -0000 Hi,=20 http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/presentation/dp= dk-packet-processing-ia-overview-presentation.pdf Foil # 27 has the forwarding performance for ES-2658 core. Foil # 7 has the problem statement indicating small packet size. Thx -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Fred Pedrisa Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 3:01 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] Core Performance Hi, guys. =20 What is the expected performance using a 2650 (2.0ghz) per core ? In terms = of packet forwarding with a 82599 ? =20 - Small 64b packets ? - Large 1540b packets ? =20 Sincerely, =20 Fred