DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Wenbo Cao <caowenbo@mucse.com>,
	Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
	yaojun@mucse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] net/rnp: add ethdev probe and remove
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:36:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b134eee-95f1-53f9-2f24-b6a2b0bea3af@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901023050.40893-3-caowenbo@mucse.com>

On 9/1/2023 3:30 AM, Wenbo Cao wrote:
> Add basic PCIe ethdev probe and remove.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenbo Cao <caowenbo@mucse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/rnp/rnp.h        | 13 ++++++
>  drivers/net/rnp/rnp_ethdev.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/rnp/rnp.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/rnp/rnp.h b/drivers/net/rnp/rnp.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..76d281cc0a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/rnp/rnp.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright(C) 2023 Mucse IC Design Ltd.
> + */
> +#ifndef __RNP_H__
> +#define __RNP_H__
> +
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_MUCSE	(0x8848)
> +#define RNP_DEV_ID_N10G		(0x1000)
> +
> +struct rnp_eth_port {
> +} __rte_cache_aligned;
> +

Is the struct needs to be cache aligned?

> +#endif /* __RNP_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/rnp/rnp_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/rnp/rnp_ethdev.c
> index 9ce3c0b497..390f2e7743 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/rnp/rnp_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/rnp/rnp_ethdev.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,86 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>   * Copyright(C) 2023 Mucse IC Design Ltd.
>   */
> +
> +#include <ethdev_pci.h>
> +#include <rte_io.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +
> +#include "rnp.h"
> +
> +static int
> +rnp_eth_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> +{
> +	RTE_SET_USED(eth_dev);
> +
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +rnp_eth_dev_uninit(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> +{
> +	RTE_SET_USED(eth_dev);
> +
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +rnp_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
> +{
> +	struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name);
> +
> +	if (eth_dev) {
> +		/* Cleanup eth dev */
> +		rc = rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove(pci_dev,
> +				rnp_eth_dev_uninit);
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;
> +	}
> +	/* Nothing to be done for secondary processes */
> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> +		return 0;
> +

Primary also don't do anything after this stage, I suggest adding this
code when primary & secondary diverges.

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +rnp_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv, struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	RTE_SET_USED(pci_drv);
> +
> +	rc = rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe(pci_dev, sizeof(struct rnp_eth_port),
> +					   rnp_eth_dev_init);
> +
> +	/* On error on secondary, recheck if port exists in primary or
> +	 * in mid of detach state.
> +	 */
> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY && rc)
> +		if (!rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name))
> +			return 0;

Why this additional secondary check is required?
'rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe()' should be dealing with
primary/secondary process case.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-01  2:30 [PATCH v6 0/8] [v6]drivers/net Add Support mucse N10 Pmd Driver Wenbo Cao
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] net/rnp: add skeleton Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:35   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-06  8:15     ` 11
2024-03-29 11:28   ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-29 14:45     ` 11
2024-04-02 10:15       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] net/rnp: add ethdev probe and remove Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:36   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-09-06 10:42     ` 11
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] net/rnp: add device init and uninit Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:44   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-06 11:03     ` 11
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] net/rnp: add mbx basic api feature Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:45   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-06 10:32     ` 11
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] net/rnp add reset code for Chip Init process Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:46   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-06  9:23     ` 11
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] net/rnp add port info resource init Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 16:56   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-06  9:07     ` 11
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] net/rnp add devargs runtime parsing functions Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:46   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-06  9:13     ` 11
2023-09-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] net/rnp handle device interrupts Wenbo Cao
2023-09-05 15:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] [v6]drivers/net Add Support mucse N10 Pmd Driver Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b134eee-95f1-53f9-2f24-b6a2b0bea3af@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=caowenbo@mucse.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yaojun@mucse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).