DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Wenjun Wu <wenjun1.wu@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	<jingjing.wu@intel.com>,  <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	<qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: support FDIR L3 fields for IP fragment packets
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 14:59:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b2dd6ae-b3fd-7d7b-5e80-90f838b633fb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802075754.952979-1-wenjun1.wu@intel.com>

On 8/2/2021 8:57 AM, Wenjun Wu wrote:
> Add support of FDIR L3 fields for both IPv4 and IPv6 fragment packets.
> 

Description mentions from both IPv4 & IPv6 but only IPv6 macro is updated, is
this expected?

Is following correct:
Before this patch flow director rules were not applied to fragmented IPv4 & IPv6
packets (so packets were not able to sent to specific queues), but after this
patch it does.
Is it the case that HW configuration was missing and hash is not calculated for
these kind of packets etc.. If you have more details can you please provide?
Also what was happening to these packets previously, sent to queue 0 by default?

Overall can please provide more description and check below question related to
'field_selector'?

Thanks,
ferruh

> Signed-off-by: Wenjun Wu <wenjun1.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c
> index da3eec8b59..32b06044f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
>  	IAVF_INSET_IPV6_HOP_LIMIT)
>  
>  #define IAVF_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6_FRAG_EXT (\
> -	IAVF_INSET_IPV6_ID)
> +	IAVF_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6 | IAVF_INSET_IPV6_ID)
>  
>  #define IAVF_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6_UDP (\
>  	IAVF_INSET_IPV6_SRC | IAVF_INSET_IPV6_DST | \
> @@ -664,6 +664,7 @@ iavf_fdir_add_fragment_hdr(struct virtchnl_proto_hdrs *hdrs, int layer)
>  	/* adding dummy fragment header */
>  	hdr1 = &hdrs->proto_hdr[layer];
>  	VIRTCHNL_SET_PROTO_HDR_TYPE(hdr1, IPV4_FRAG);
> +	hdr1->field_selector = 0;

Is this change related to new support, or fixing something that was missing
previously?

>  	hdrs->count = ++layer;
>  }
>  
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-13 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-02  7:57 Wenjun Wu
2021-08-10  7:42 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-08-13 13:59 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-08-17  6:35   ` Wu, Wenjun1
2021-08-17  6:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix wrong FDIR L3 field set for IPv4 " Wenjun Wu
2021-08-29 11:18   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-08-17  6:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/iavf: support FDIR L3 fields for IPv6 " Wenjun Wu
2021-08-29 11:21   ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b2dd6ae-b3fd-7d7b-5e80-90f838b633fb@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=wenjun1.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).