From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881031150 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:50:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2017 09:50:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,321,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1120769313" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.38]) ([10.237.220.38]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2017 09:50:17 -0800 To: "Wiles, Keith" , Pascal Mazon References: <1485855778-15496-1-git-send-email-pascal.mazon@6wind.com> <39a46c11-66c4-d8ed-a2bc-d9421cb4afd0@6wind.com> <9fa2c783-349c-e20c-0e57-0c24e67a4683@intel.com> <9C574760-33CF-4163-94D4-A0C919F4592C@intel.com> <74B7FC24-638D-4A48-A02D-C80B5B4E7E2B@intel.com> <78727e66-3588-79ab-6448-9858c19e2361@6wind.com> <8a13261b-215c-e294-1f61-b57e5ea998eb@6wind.com> <8D715219-BBBE-4484-8CB1-499C9DBE781A@intel.com> Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <5ee7a20c-9bd9-79f3-1ac9-b8d59ca837da@intel.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:50:17 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8D715219-BBBE-4484-8CB1-499C9DBE781A@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] net/tap: use correct tap name X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:50:20 -0000 On 2/1/2017 3:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote: >> >> On 02/01/2017 04:25 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>> >>>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:11 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/01/2017 12:29 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 01/31/2017 05:06 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:> >>>>>>> Looking at the changes to set the link up/down and the adding the two functions. I noticed in the stop/start routines I was set the link in DPDK and not adjusting the interface link. Should the stop/start routine also do the same thing? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, my patch is probably wrong. >>>>>> The best option would probably be to set dev->data->dev_link.link_status >>>>>> appropriately inside tap_link_set() only. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure it's compulsory to actually set the link UP in tap_dev_start() >>>>>> (respectively DOWN in tap_dev_stop()). >>>>>> If it is, however, it would be best done using tap_link_set() in those >>>>>> functions. >>>>> >>>>> I was setting the link up/down in both places in the old code. The gotta is link up/down came later (I guess) and applications only call start/stop. In the other drivers like ring the like they tend to set link in start/stop and in link up/down, which is what I patterned my driver on. >>>>> >>>>> I looked around and the only applications calling link up/down was testpmd and ip_pipeline, but all of the apps call start/stop. Even the docs to not suggest that link up/down be used it appears start/stop must set the Link state and the developer can call link up/down APIs if needed for others reasons. >>>>> >>>>> I assume the link up/down only effects the link state and the start/stop is creating/destroying resources. >>>>> >>>>> My only solution I guess is to add the link up/down code to the start/stop API. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand your conclusion. >>>> If the apps usually call start/stop only, then definitely those functions should set the link state appropriately. >>>> To that effect, I think it best to just call tap_link_set() in tap_dev_start() (and similar for stopping). >>>> Apps with just start/stop functions would get the expected behavior, and the tap PMD would also support setting the link up/down independently, for testpmd and ip_pipeline for example. >>>> >>>> Does that sound fine? >>> >>> Yes, this was what I was trying to say and calling tap_link_set() in tap_dev_start() is the solution. >> >> Great, that looks good to me! > > Ferruh, Please apply Pascal’s 6 patches and I will based my changes on top of those changes. Does that sound reasonable? That is good, I will. Pascal, Only patch 1/6 commit log needs reworking, rest looks good, (although I still will do one more round of basic tests). For commit log update, do you want to send a v2 or prefer me do the update? Thanks, ferruh > >> >> Regards, >> Pascal > > Regards, > Keith >