DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Singh, Aman Deep" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload validation
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:48:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fd4a27b-c6a4-e7f9-825f-74de6201238c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6725b879-c2fd-3902-eee0-2b5ea284562b@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3103 bytes --]


On 11/17/2021 3:39 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/17/2021 8:57 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
>> Hello Ferruh,
>>
>> Can you estimate when this patch will be merged into 21.11 ?
>>
>
> Hi Gregory,
>
> It is not merged because it is missing review.
>
> Ori, Slava, can you please help with the review?
>
>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gregory
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 14:24
>>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Gregory Etelson
>>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan
>>> Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
>>> stable@dpdk.org; Xiaoyun Li
>>> <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix tunnel offload
>>> validation
>>>
>>> Tunnel offload API allows application to restore
>>> packet to
>>> its original form if chain of flows missed after
>>> DECAP action.
>>> The main idea of the tunnel offload API was to
>>> query port PMD
>>> to provide flow elements - actions or items.
>>> Flow elements supplied by PMD are merged with
>>> original flow rule
>>> elements provided by testpmd operator to
>>> create a new flow rule,
>>> optimal for PMD, to implement the tunnel
>>> offload API.
>>> That flow rule transformation is hidden form
>>> testpmd operator and uses
>>> internal testpmd resources.
>>>
>>> Current testpmd did not release tunnel offload
>>> resources if flow rule
>>> validation failed.
>>>
>>> The patch always releases tunnel offload
>>> resources after flow rule
>>> validation returns.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1b9f274623b8 ("app/testpmd: add
>>> commands for tunnel offload")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson
>>> <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>   app/test-pmd/config.c | 6 ++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-
>>> pmd/config.c
>>> index a18871d461..4870aaeba6 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>>> @@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@
>>> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
>>>       struct rte_flow_error error;
>>>       struct port_flow_tunnel *pft = NULL;
>>>       struct rte_port *port;
>>> +    int ret;
>>>
>>>       if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id,
>>> ENABLED_WARN) ||
>>>           port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
>>> @@ -2037,10 +2038,11 @@
>>> port_flow_validate(portid_t port_id,
>>>           if (pft->actions)
>>>               actions = pft->actions;
>>>       }
>>> -    if (rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
>>> pattern, actions, &error))
>>> -        return
>>> port_flow_complain(&error);
>>> +    ret = rte_flow_validate(port_id, attr,
>>> pattern, actions, &error);
>>>       if (tunnel_ops->enabled)
>>>
>>>     port_flow_tunnel_offload_cmd_release(
>>> port_id, tunnel_ops, pft);
>>> +    if (ret)
>>> +        return
>>> port_flow_complain(&error);
>>>       printf("Flow rule validated\n");
>>>       return 0;
>>>   }
>>> -- 
>>> 2.33.1
>>
>
> Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7524 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-17 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-02 12:24 [dpdk-dev] " Gregory Etelson
2021-11-17  8:57 ` Gregory Etelson
2021-11-17 10:09   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-17 10:18     ` Singh, Aman Deep [this message]
2021-11-17 10:27     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-17 12:26       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fd4a27b-c6a4-e7f9-825f-74de6201238c@intel.com \
    --to=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).