From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B344DA0032; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:03:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5163042684; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:03:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C14741109 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D796A5C0161; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:03:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:03:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1657638212; x= 1657724612; bh=crud7tnkOw7zaGUldAzI+0BP1ThZ+6iy8wRq2Ag+1Dg=; b=U SsZ885TXqRgiDcDqbanRZDONag0qZclxgBYfZJjJkE3lmpgfw8Vj5uSm/7ZzUctY tzmbThxOMQkth7JXHPzqlflGG53rFnweC8dl1vE25xTezr4ERQIU6iSfbrPI2SmH KXliaDqc+n2b6o9xWiyck0RyJzAyV7raJBAxdrF+8VjmRCNIW800+7k/jB2nZ7LN Zo1bUfs/cd+KMV9Bm0ZCHSEAgBA6QjEjvT8Zg6NdPL6votQ1JQmQspAnk5GYzwoA XVeGaeyGOV8pLLJ8fqK7nPxk6S8waET8SzCipkCzOWmm5UD2YVMhHHoz2IKKCjL/ pPsnzszDhENZe4P6O/Org== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1657638212; x= 1657724612; bh=crud7tnkOw7zaGUldAzI+0BP1ThZ+6iy8wRq2Ag+1Dg=; b=v +oVh2/WOuMA/8DZamFZ+JGmwlg3rVnxFtlO7iWzmkJWZs2+/owzWtMBcKEv0x0Ed 1FPdoQHBDcwVHz9dPFpDzrMFvw5R/T1of4GhJbLyLGAgOmTT27xhfIQ5x/MugcEK MyCZTClDFz/9SPufyxGSG3MGyaCkhFDJBkI9L/sVO/m2YLO8WWBpe8CKOum3Hyox +290sVgDMdf6bBLOU3gB/g5b2Qh356mTjczlpPJKEOXlKwrsrPU4AO41zNs82VvD S2WnaOgmv4eimsWW6rayVnVnemSPK0Erl91KRIOB6QI3HQ/tvNMS7zdhHmQ1tKla 0Y5IZ8qBihjDLoZ0e7UhQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejhedgkeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejjefffffgffekfefflefgkeelteejffelledugefhheelffet heevudffudfgvdenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:03:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vamsi Attunuru Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, vattunuru@marvell.com, gakhil@marvell.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, anoobj@marvell.com, mdr@ashroe.eu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] doc: announce addition of new ipsec event subtypes Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:03:30 +0200 Message-ID: <6043248.xgNZFEDtJV@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220627052937.759050-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> References: <20220624133551.365962-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> <20220627052937.759050-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 27/06/2022 07:29, Vamsi Attunuru: > New event subtypes need to be added for notifying expiry events > upon reaching IPsec SA soft packet expiry and hard packet/byte > expiry limits. This would be added in DPDK 22.11. > > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > --- > More details on new event subtype proposal discussion are in below email thread. > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220416192530.173895-8-gakhil@marvell.com/ > > v2: rephrase title and git log. > --- > +* ethdev: The enum ``rte_eth_event_ipsec_subtype`` would be extended to add > + new subtype values ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_PKT_EXPIRY``, > + ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_BYTE_HARD_EXPIRY`` and > + ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_PKT_HARD_EXPIRY`` in DPDK 22.11. While at it, would you consider avoiding future ABI breakage with RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_MAX?