DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com>,
	Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>,
	Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers/net: remove explicit include of legacy filtering
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 21:00:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6076825.RBgRJtLnUj@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa45de1c-8e2a-4eb4-17eb-a412d321983b@intel.com>

24/03/2021 19:08, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 3/21/2021 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The header file rte_eth_ctrl.h should not be needed because
> > this legacy filtering API is completely replaced with the rte_flow API.
> > However some definitions from this file are still used by some drivers,
> > but such usage is already covered by an implicit include via rte_ethdev.h.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > Acked-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/dpaa2/dpaa2_ptp.c       | 1 -
> >   drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c        | 1 -
> >   drivers/net/ice/ice_acl_filter.c    | 1 -
> >   drivers/net/ice/ice_hash.c          | 1 -
> >   drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 1 -
> >   drivers/net/igc/igc_filter.h        | 1 -
> >   drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_flow.c    | 1 -
> 
> Although this will work, if the above drives are using the defines from the 
> header file, isn't it better to include it explicitly?
> 
> What is the benefit of including the header implicitly?

The benefit is to progressively remove rte_eth_ctrl.h.
I want it to disappear.



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 22:17 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: remove some use of legacy filtering interface Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-11 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: replace callback getting filter operations Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12  1:44   ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-03-12  8:22     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12  8:25       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-12  8:40         ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-03-12  7:09   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-12  8:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-11 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] drivers/net: remove explicit include of legacy filtering Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12  1:21   ` Xu, Rosen
2021-03-12 17:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] ethdev: remove some use of legacy filtering interface Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12 17:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: replace callback getting filter operations Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12 19:14     ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-13  4:16     ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-03-15  3:05     ` Xu, Rosen
2021-03-15  7:18     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-15  7:54       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-15  8:43         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-15  8:55           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-15  9:08             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-15  9:15               ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-19 18:12                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-20  7:54                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-20 10:38                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-15  7:22     ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-03-12 17:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers/net: remove explicit include of legacy filtering Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-15  7:19     ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-03-21  8:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev: remove some use " Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-21  9:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: replace callback getting filter operations Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-21  9:08     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-24 18:05     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-26 17:41       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-29 20:56     ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-21  9:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers/net: remove explicit include of legacy filtering Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 18:08     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-24 20:00       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-03-25  5:53         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-25 10:00           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-25 10:20             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-26 15:37               ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-26 21:45                 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6076825.RBgRJtLnUj@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).