From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570575938 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:16:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id g62so101732025wme.0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:16:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=0AkZsJJ0VZFPU9lauAbyLxs2kYxTI/AkRXrgoi2uKYs=; b=RuGwy8AVzao43jCMeGgTI+iV8B9lCoAsG3zVElNnIEE3sa2RFqDHPJ60UZKygLk9g+ 4ofSLWjgUyz5F8vSgsS6YplJp5xlaKyAgcdTJ3QGhke4+Jc06p7JP3xyV/LVB3NbUhgL QTMpUazH9d+mXPQ1kU/wesNHxQu44vIS3UpVJ1zGoYbYIEsipT2okAcGriuED3tqoGZ2 +kihjFgeH+37x+PlbdvyRUgiYWVaj8LU7NJxkHPrxWn6GEzImRexohSppnoOG/6IskiK 100NmxhU7obS5n2Ya5/hkn7GXzHO842UA9MAlwsLdIrccSLaOpArdFizarVNCdD9hSic Y73A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=0AkZsJJ0VZFPU9lauAbyLxs2kYxTI/AkRXrgoi2uKYs=; b=AEc5JTajecuWnqmX16BprFHabQJFi7iI2gmJ/LSg1aBXgMrdCfpEMRY69FblkQAZyt moPVgk4ZnHoXDzrsu7bs3UogcE1dct9J7pMJJ8qNMqftCXebV08PoTvtpwBwAzmXfZ5T hA1SOqkIBtNneQmqQAjgVkDn+2eHx8wwx7QUB/DaN36zKT86FNMcTSCNlHbaUpSATDGY F/6AQgVNua77GVQ1ZHjbnzPwAAkBEYg0rqIxYN53ikJh8YpmSOTftHPmuMSl43a/iOTV MSgBA7OcVpDQPLPGiLKH5lFk+2KSXnv5m4r6tXWvoGUk5XVWo2liO0Z8PcLZyi0p1Nur ZDHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORFR6e9n8hvfxp92v5DfNLwFdd+IrpQUQO4wA32m/dWewJ4GVLms3MUC49DFZ2ClXup X-Received: by 10.194.47.169 with SMTP id e9mr18237562wjn.175.1455531400207; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jc7sm24672285wjb.33.2016.02.15.02.16.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:16:39 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Panu Matilainen Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:08 +0100 Message-ID: <6087984.WHOrx6HCKo@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56C18C78.7080307@redhat.com> References: <0863DE89-580E-4AA2-B949-25179510BD55@mhcomputing.net> <56C18C78.7080307@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vm_power_manager uses channel_commands.h which is not placed in installed copy of DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:16:40 -0000 2016-02-15 10:29, Panu Matilainen: > On 02/14/2016 01:38 AM, Matthew Hall wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I found a peculiarity in the vm_power_manager example on DPDK 2.2 if you use an installed copy of DPDK to compile the examples instead of the master copy (while trying to update some outdated stuff in my build system). [...] > > Did anybody run into this before? > > Yes, the problem exists at least since DPDK 2.1 but somehow never > remembered to report / do something about it. > > Basically either vm_power_manager example is messing with things its not > supposed to, or librte_power library isn't exporting everything needed > to fully use the it. Unfortunately both the library and the example are > lacking a maintainer :-/ Exact, you got the point. I suggest to disable this feature in your config. If it's really annoying, you are allowed to request the removal of the code. I believe someone would maintain it if he has an interest.