From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EB5A0583; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:01:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D031C026; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:01:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518851515; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:01:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847D05C034E; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 05:01:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 05:01:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=lyT4TnUSsUOhNk8FQw4EC0QBsV5cEZgLo1feYleAKH0=; b=plYtR8/584TE QX6nkfjJxPdmx3ZEyuH8eJWHhPldHMYJDBoCClp3nBMnHbljX8/S8oywUDBPw2em gkR8DiD6xmLyZtG0lKT7nZ2QSyAY0uRO+dlXPLQyhl6QTenyFrK5q/YkVdFse9gT 3XjN0oiD6mUdZrEaCPdVK3WIWkb8MJg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=lyT4TnUSsUOhNk8FQw4EC0QBsV5cEZgLo1feYleAK H0=; b=0/kkY5oIcD48Buoz6OItq4WIsiY6IUx2qYq8VLkxkRWnY+/HJXZsYAd85 Pgfs+8TOpdwvbzGYD1fVlB7R1a8AWWJYxD6Gh4G6KA/mxrVSQ6ntwh2c5DsD/1ma HA0B5q8mKJ8w6DtP9GhdnpHMbaqAlX2uMCTrQV1ur2FKJUF8DcJSykI91CvjnlnW 2MzW97bSIIl8tdai+vanijlttRaGrMz+fjHkYUgOPTqsnxiRTrfaHg6ZscRY5zTE +JyazVIlp0gTmxFmDGZfcLShZpjkj5wdanaUPoYrbFH1X8o88WS+A/MGZ9bvbN5C yeikCzWOscT/zT3wyUH/UjsFlSvbg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudefkedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgpddughhfihhlvgguohhnvggttghsthgrsghlvggu phgukhdrohhrghdphhhtthhpshhlihhnkhhtohguphgukhdrohhrghdphhhtthhpshifhh gvnhhpohhinhhtihhnghhtohguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdef rddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 544A53280059; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 05:01:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:00:59 +0100 Message-ID: <60947579.3F2A3RajZp@xps> In-Reply-To: <20200319082859.7162-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> References: <20200319082859.7162-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: prefer https when pointing to dpdk.org X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/03/2020 09:28, David Marchand: > for file in $(git grep -l http://.*dpdk.org doc/); do > sed -i -e 's#http://\(.*dpdk.org\)#https://\1#g' $file; > done > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > --- > + # links must prefer https over http > + awk -v FOLDERS='doc' \ > + -v EXPRESSIONS='http://.*dpdk.org' \ > + -v RET_ON_FAIL=1 \ > + -v MESSAGE='Using non https link to dpdk.org' \ > + -f $(dirname $(readlink -f $0))/check-forbidden-tokens.awk \ > + "$1" || res=1 Interesting policy. When no authentication is required, I was trying to use simple http, in the hope of making access faster. What is the benefit of https for documentation? Avoid man-in-the-middle?