From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8254DA0547; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:03:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B18410E2; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:03:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC7040142 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:03:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9CD5C01E4; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:03:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:03:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=u256.net; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=Hs9UejU/kOD5w9hSeSPW7g0q0H5PBnK hEGC1AlFzxZQ=; b=QIITA/7uqRX4CAq/F9YYT2jPRUJIL0nTYVVBjRmGyx2wDmS qU5IRouhoSN3I7zLeRPQzi8otVwZ0YTwyLkHQuYMisWxr7K9EIa+OOwrT/ZU7v9k mjY1y30oteB77KD6hR0ZjV36ZloeNtxOOXuBqPyJ9x6kVgEdqg3B9Df4A3HLBnjc 5Rz8qp9iLFLZZXmNQZx7AnJsBhAZWJTBsAt2a5ZeVC5N+9b7DMNd4EIhBxpYu6na aXzRcCh6i5OQ7NH/Cn7A11y0cLjA8CH1UM+T4E+No1begRjkwG0zTPs5LMMQB1rd 0etE9zqjwgUKT1xq2Kq8Rx5kWSk5XKpKIgCognQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Hs9Uej U/kOD5w9hSeSPW7g0q0H5PBnKhEGC1AlFzxZQ=; b=hw1fQ7JiBmeYrvaYduQlr6 RWd1cPZ+Vj7s3Ax0qWzNZ3V0D2zqv2vDyuXAcAicG2xU8relIm1Pnoo/n8i2fCZz PPYmL9ncu27180GLoG8t5wdxQiGvGhZWGx47/rS9PuV0mD4WZ+8fM02GYj/7dTSy mrfzngbcStoHhcEHsIR5hFD6tO+iHcpC5dT2jSa+skFBk8iEl2za0nsOFX1E5cdK AA+vLrQRVwNYGy09wt05m0kMFiybhO4rJI6hdZ0YVm6RgVmksoc+D3kDZyqWgOLH mNdwHUJuwBOt2iGF/RaLxof0540OI3RI/vbNBqshLTQc/SUUwnD6sCTFi/pug/Dw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddviedgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepifgrtoht rghnpgftihhvvghtuceoghhrihhvvgesuhdvheeirdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrh hnpefguefhffelleduueehueetueefgedtieevudduhfegveetuedtleeuffeuheekfeen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhhivh gvsehuvdehiedrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 675AD21E006E; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:03:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1369-gd055fb5e7c-fm-20211018.002-gd055fb5e Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <60b316e9-5c2e-4964-b4c6-0356e7ff8644@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211020154739.2514499-4-xuemingl@nvidia.com> References: <20211005123012.264727-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <20211020154739.2514499-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <20211020154739.2514499-4-xuemingl@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:03:15 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ga=C3=ABtan_Rivet?= To: "Xueming(Steven) Li" , dev@dpdk.org, "David Marchand" Cc: "Thomas Monjalon" , "Lior Margalit" Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/devargs: add devargs test cases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 20, 2021, at 17:47, Xueming Li wrote: > Initial version to test global devargs syntax. > > Signed-off-by: Xueming Li Hi, Thanks for making the changes. I have the nagging impression that the runtime checks could have been written in a lighter way, but maybe that's just it. It seems to fit the function, so it will do. Thanks again for dealing with this, and it's very nice to have those unit tests. Reviewed-by: Gaetan Rivet -- Gaetan Rivet