From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA0AA0352; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:18:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE14E1C2ED; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:18:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462D61C2E8; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:18:23 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2020 04:18:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,326,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="257334280" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.35]) ([10.237.221.35]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2020 04:18:18 -0800 To: =?UTF-8?B?5pa557uf5rWpNTA0NTA=?= <fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn> Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, jia.guo@intel.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, jungle845943968@outlook.com, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com> References: <AM6AEwBQCIJk9JP063jdHKr*.3.1579174548054.Hmail.fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Autocrypt: addr=ferruh.yigit@intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXZCFABEADCujshBOAaqPZpwShdkzkyGpJ15lmxiSr3jVMqOtQS/sB3FYLT0/d3+bvy qbL9YnlbPyRvZfnP3pXiKwkRoR1RJwEo2BOf6hxdzTmLRtGtwWzI9MwrUPj6n/ldiD58VAGQ +iR1I/z9UBUN/ZMksElA2D7Jgg7vZ78iKwNnd+vLBD6I61kVrZ45Vjo3r+pPOByUBXOUlxp9 GWEKKIrJ4eogqkVNSixN16VYK7xR+5OUkBYUO+sE6etSxCr7BahMPKxH+XPlZZjKrxciaWQb +dElz3Ab4Opl+ZT/bK2huX+W+NJBEBVzjTkhjSTjcyRdxvS1gwWRuXqAml/sh+KQjPV1PPHF YK5LcqLkle+OKTCa82OvUb7cr+ALxATIZXQkgmn+zFT8UzSS3aiBBohg3BtbTIWy51jNlYdy ezUZ4UxKSsFuUTPt+JjHQBvF7WKbmNGS3fCid5Iag4tWOfZoqiCNzxApkVugltxoc6rG2TyX CmI2rP0mQ0GOsGXA3+3c1MCdQFzdIn/5tLBZyKy4F54UFo35eOX8/g7OaE+xrgY/4bZjpxC1 1pd66AAtKb3aNXpHvIfkVV6NYloo52H+FUE5ZDPNCGD0/btFGPWmWRmkPybzColTy7fmPaGz cBcEEqHK4T0aY4UJmE7Ylvg255Kz7s6wGZe6IR3N0cKNv++O7QARAQABtCVGZXJydWggWWln aXQgPGZlcnJ1aC55aWdpdEBpbnRlbC5jb20+iQJUBBMBCgA+AhsDAh4BAheABQsJCAcDBRUK CQgLBRYCAwEAFiEE0jZTh0IuwoTjmYHH+TPrQ98TYR8FAl1meboFCQlupOoACgkQ+TPrQ98T YR9ACBAAv2tomhyxY0Tp9Up7mNGLfEdBu/7joB/vIdqMRv63ojkwr9orQq5V16V/25+JEAD0 60cKodBDM6HdUvqLHatS8fooWRueSXHKYwJ3vxyB2tWDyZrLzLI1jxEvunGodoIzUOtum0Ce gPynnfQCelXBja0BwLXJMplM6TY1wXX22ap0ZViC0m714U5U4LQpzjabtFtjT8qOUR6L7hfy YQ72PBuktGb00UR/N5UrR6GqB0x4W41aZBHXfUQnvWIMmmCrRUJX36hOTYBzh+x86ULgg7H2 1499tA4o6rvE13FiGccplBNWCAIroAe/G11rdoN5NBgYVXu++38gTa/MBmIt6zRi6ch15oLA Ln2vHOdqhrgDuxjhMpG2bpNE36DG/V9WWyWdIRlz3NYPCDM/S3anbHlhjStXHOz1uHOnerXM 1jEjcsvmj1vSyYoQMyRcRJmBZLrekvgZeh7nJzbPHxtth8M7AoqiZ/o/BpYU+0xZ+J5/szWZ aYxxmIRu5ejFf+Wn9s5eXNHmyqxBidpCWvcbKYDBnkw2+Y9E5YTpL0mS0dCCOlrO7gca27ux ybtbj84aaW1g0CfIlUnOtHgMCmz6zPXThb+A8H8j3O6qmPoVqT3qnq3Uhy6GOoH8Fdu2Vchh TWiF5yo+pvUagQP6LpslffufSnu+RKAagkj7/RSuZV25Ag0EV9ZMvgEQAKc0Db17xNqtSwEv mfp4tkddwW9XA0tWWKtY4KUdd/jijYqc3fDD54ESYpV8QWj0xK4YM0dLxnDU2IYxjEshSB1T qAatVWz9WtBYvzalsyTqMKP3w34FciuL7orXP4AibPtrHuIXWQOBECcVZTTOdZYGAzaYzxiA ONzF9eTiwIqe9/oaOjTwTLnOarHt16QApTYQSnxDUQljeNvKYt1lZE/gAUUxNLWsYyTT+22/ vU0GDUahsJxs1+f1yEr+OGrFiEAmqrzpF0lCS3f/3HVTU6rS9cK3glVUeaTF4+1SK5ZNO35p iVQCwphmxa+dwTG/DvvHYCtgOZorTJ+OHfvCnSVjsM4kcXGjJPy3JZmUtyL9UxEbYlrffGPQ I3gLXIGD5AN5XdAXFCjjaID/KR1c9RHd7Oaw0Pdcq9UtMLgM1vdX8RlDuMGPrj5sQrRVbgYH fVU/TQCk1C9KhzOwg4Ap2T3tE1umY/DqrXQgsgH71PXFucVjOyHMYXXugLT8YQ0gcBPHy9mZ qw5mgOI5lCl6d4uCcUT0l/OEtPG/rA1lxz8ctdFBVOQOxCvwRG2QCgcJ/UTn5vlivul+cThi 6ERPvjqjblLncQtRg8izj2qgmwQkvfj+h7Ex88bI8iWtu5+I3K3LmNz/UxHBSWEmUnkg4fJl Rr7oItHsZ0ia6wWQ8lQnABEBAAGJAjwEGAEKACYCGwwWIQTSNlOHQi7ChOOZgcf5M+tD3xNh HwUCXWZ5wAUJB3FgggAKCRD5M+tD3xNhH2O+D/9OEz62YuJQLuIuOfL67eFTIB5/1+0j8Tsu o2psca1PUQ61SZJZOMl6VwNxpdvEaolVdrpnSxUF31kPEvR0Igy8HysQ11pj8AcgH0a9FrvU /8k2Roccd2ZIdpNLkirGFZR7LtRw41Kt1Jg+lafI0efkiHKMT/6D/P1EUp1RxOBNtWGV2hrd 0Yg9ds+VMphHHU69fDH02SwgpvXwG8Qm14Zi5WQ66R4CtTkHuYtA63sS17vMl8fDuTCtvfPF HzvdJLIhDYN3Mm1oMjKLlq4PUdYh68Fiwm+boJoBUFGuregJFlO3hM7uHBDhSEnXQr5mqpPM 6R/7Q5BjAxrwVBisH0yQGjsWlnysRWNfExAE2sRePSl0or9q19ddkRYltl6X4FDUXy2DTXa9 a+Fw4e1EvmcF3PjmTYs9IE3Vc64CRQXkhujcN4ZZh5lvOpU8WgyDxFq7bavFnSS6kx7Tk29/ wNJBp+cf9qsQxLbqhW5kfORuZGecus0TLcmpZEFKKjTJBK9gELRBB/zoN3j41hlEl7uTUXTI JQFLhpsFlEdKLujyvT/aCwP3XWT+B2uZDKrMAElF6ltpTxI53JYi22WO7NH7MR16Fhi4R6vh FHNBOkiAhUpoXRZXaCR6+X4qwA8CwHGqHRBfYFSU/Ulq1ZLR+S3hNj2mbnSx0lBs1eEqe2vh cA== Message-ID: <61a10224-b316-2dd1-0bc1-9db64643bbff@intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:18:18 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <AM6AEwBQCIJk9JP063jdHKr*.3.1579174548054.Hmail.fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] Fixes: ethdev: secondary process change shared memory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On 1/16/2020 11:35 AM, 方统浩50450 wrote: > > >>@Fang, only can you please make a new version to update the >>'rte_eth_copy_pci_info' function comment to document shared data is not updated >>for the secondary process? > >>So this suggest going on with Fang's patch. I only requested an additional note >>in function comment related to this secondary check. > > @Ferruh Yigit > Should I update a new version patch of "rte_eth_copy_pci_info" function and explain > wthether the regular functioning of secondary process is affected or not? > I cant figure out what you need me to do. Hi Fang, Yes can you please send a new version of your patch. In new version, additionally update the 'rte_eth_copy_pci_info()' function comment to document that function updates 'eth_dev->data' only for primary process. Thanks, ferruh > > > 发件人：Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> > 发送日期：2020-01-16 17:04:09 > 收件人：Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> > 抄送人："方统浩50450" <fangtonghao@sangfor.com.cn>,dev@dpdk.org,stable@dpdk.org,jia.guo@intel.com,cunming.liang@intel.com,qi.z.zhang@intel.com,jungle845943968@outlook.com,Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com> > 主题：Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] Fixes: ethdev: secondary process change shared memory>On 1/16/2020 7:43 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >>> On 1/15/20 11:43 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>>> 15/01/2020 19:35, Ferruh Yigit: >>>>> On 1/15/2020 6:49 AM, 方统浩50450 wrote: >>>>>> Hi Ferruh, thanks for your message. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We developed a ethtool-dpdk which is secondary process based dpdk 17.08 version. Our device >>>>>> support hotplug detach, but hotplug deatch is failed when we use ethtool-dpdk.We found the >>>>>> secondary process will change the shared memory when initializing.Secondary process calls >>>>>> "rte_eth_dev_pci_allocate" function and enters "rte_eth_copy_pci_info" function. >>>>>> (rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe -> rte_eth_dev_pci_allocate -> rte_eth_copy_pci_info) >>>>>> Then it sets the value of struct "rte_eth_dev_data.dev_flags" to zero.In our platform, this value >>>>>> is equal to 0x0003.(RTE_ETH_DEV_DETACHABLE | RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC),but after reset >>>>>> the "dev_flags", the value changed to 0x0002.(RTE_ETH_DEV_DETACHABLE).So, our device hotplug >>>>>> detach is failed.I found the similar problem in other dpdk version, include dpdk 19.11.Even though >>>>>> the deivce hotplug detach is discarded,but i think the shared memory changed is unexpected by primary >>>>>> process. >>> >>> Hold on, just for my understanding. As far as I can see >>> RTE_ETH_DEV_DETACHABLE was removed in 17.11. Does it >>> change something in above description? >> >>Overall secondary overwrites primary values, I think we should fix it >>independent from the flags involved. >> >>> >>>>> I agree this is the problem. >>>>> In the driver code, 'rte_eth_copy_pci_info' is called only by primary process, >>>>> >>>>> but the generic code is faulty. >>>>> >>>>> And in 19.11 additionally 'eth_dev_pci_specific_init' also seems has same problem. >>> >>> Yes, as I understand RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE, >>> RTE_ETH_DEV_BONDED_SLAVE, RTE_ETH_DEV_REPRESENTOR and >>> RTE_ETH_DEV_NOLIVE_MAC_ADDR may be lost because of >>> reinit (if not restored in other branches). Bad anyway. >>> >>>>>> Our driver is ixgbe, i think this problem has a little relationship with driver, Secondary process >>>>>> enters "rte_eth_copy_pci_info" by "rte_eth_dev_pci_allocate".And I agree your opinion, the helper >>>>>> function should simple on what it does.I have two ways to fix this problem, one is add an if-statement >>>>>> >>>>>> in "rte_eth_dev_pci_allocate" function to forbid secondary process enters "rte_eth_copy_pci_info" function, >>>>>> another way is add an if-statement in "rte_eth_copy_pci_info" function to forbid secondary process change >>>>>> shared memory.And First way need to ensure the "rte_eth_copy_pci_info" function won't be called anywhere else. >>>>>> I think the second way is simple and lower risk. >>>>> >>>>> Yes these are the two options. >>>>> >>>>> I agree adding check in the 'rte_eth_copy_pci_info' covers all cases and safer. >>>>> BUT my concern was adding decision making to simple/leaf function and make it >>>>> harder to debug/use, instead of giving what primary/secondary process should >>>>> call decision in higher level. >>>>> >>>>> But I just recognized that some PMDs are calling 'rte_eth_copy_pci_info' on >>>>> secondary process, like mlx4 or szedata2, and most probably this is not their >>>>> intention. >>>>> And 'eth_dev->intr_handle' set in 'rte_eth_copy_pci_info', not calling this >>>>> function may have side affect of 'eth_dev->intr_handle' not set in secondary. >>>>> >>>>> With above considerations I am OK to your proposal to cover all cases, Thomas, >>>>> Andrew, any concern? >>> >>> I would put if condition in rte_eth_copy_pci_info(). >>> It is the function which writes shared space from >>> secondary process when it should not be done and it >>> should be fixed there. >> >>OK >> >>> >>>> Do you mean drivers need to be fixed? >>> >>> I'm not sure that I fully understand it. Since copy function >>> cares about intr_handle copying I'm afraid that it is not >>> 100% correct to skip it in secondary process completely as >>> many drivers do right now. Basically it makes eth_dev structure >>> in secondary process inconsistent. However, it looks like >>> most of these drivers simply obtain handle from pci_dev >>> directly and it explains why they are not affected. >>> There are exceptions which are potentially bugs, e.g. >>> drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c: ice_interrupt_handler at the end. >>> >>> I think that it would be better if intr_handle is always >>> correct in eth_dev (both primary and secondary cases) and >>> drivers use it instead of the same from pci_dev. >>> >> >>OK >> >>So this suggest going on with Fang's patch. I only requested an additional note >>in function comment related to this secondary check. > >