From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns.mahan.org (unknown [67.116.10.138]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC6C6931 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 22:44:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.71.41] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns.mahan.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4OKimpO013683; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:44:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) References: <519F74F6.3000903@mahan.org> <201305241641.38896.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <519FC787.4090006@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <519FC787.4090006@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <62EC0B6D-1A0F-41BC-9952-AA3AFC84CA5A@mahan.org> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) From: Patrick Mahan Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 13:44:51 -0700 To: Olivier MATZ Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Best example for showing throughput? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 20:44:51 -0000 Yes it is a typo. I'm away from the box and was referring to my notes. Thanks, Patrick Sent from my iPad On May 24, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hello Patrick, > >> sudo build/app/testpmd -b 0000:03:00.0 -b 0000:03:00.1 -c -n3 >> -- --nb-cores= --nb-ports=2 --rxd=2048 --rxd=2048 --mbcache=512 >> --burst=512 --rxd= --txq= > > I guess it's a typo, but just in case, I think you mean "rxq" instead > of "rxd" at the end of the command line? > > You can check that all is properly configured by using the interactive > mode of testpmd, and display the configuration with the following > commands: > > show config rxtx > show config cores > show config fwd > ... > > Regards, > Olivier