DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	<thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>, Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>,
	Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
	Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
	Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>, Chenbo Xia <chenbox@nvidia.com>,
	Tomasz Duszynski <tduszynski@marvell.com>,
	Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>, Wei Hu <weh@microsoft.com>,
	Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] bus: fix inconsistent representation of PCI numbers
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 09:55:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62c59ce2-6aab-409f-b44f-6b1faf0eaf2a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z5puC3JYHR0LBxKH@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 2025/1/30 2:06, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:17:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:54:16 +0200
>> Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> DPDK provides two formats for specifying PCI device numbers:
>>> a full version ("0000:08:00.0") and a short version ("08:00.0").
>>> Issues can occur when an application uses one format (e.g., short)
>>> while running testpmd, then attempts to use the other format
>>> (e.g., full) in a later command, resulting in a failure.
>>>
>>> The issue is that find_device goes over the list of devices and
>>> compares the user-provided string to the rte_device structure's
>>> device->name (device->name is just the string received from devargs
>>> (i.e "08:00.0" or "0000:08:00.0")).
>>> Notice that there's another field that represents the device name,
>>> but this one is in the rte_pci_bus struct. This name is actually the result
>>> of the PCI parse function ("0000:08:00.0").
>>> If we want to accurately compare these names, we'll need to bring both
>>> sides to the same representation by invoking the parse function on
>>> the user input.
>>>
>>> To make the cmp_dev_name function applicable to all buses—not just PCI—
>>> the proposed solution is to utilize the parse function implemented by
>>> each bus. When comparing names, we will call parse on the supplied
>>> string as well as on the device name itself and compare the results.
>>> This will allow consistent comparisons between different representations
>>> of same devices.
>>>
>>> Also, the pci_common_set function has been modified to improve naming
>>> consistency for PCI buses.
>>> Now, the name stored in rte_device for PCI buses will match the parsed
>>> name that is also stored in rte_pci_device name,
>>> rather than using the user-provided string from devargs.
>>> As a result, when a new PCI device is registered, the name displayed in
>>> the device list will be the parsed version.
>>>
>>> Added tests that compare and find devices in various forms of names
>>> under test_devargs.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a3ee360f4440 ("eal: add hotplug add/remove device")
>>
>> Maybe just fix for now by normalizing the PCI device string when before
>> storing and after parsing?  That would allow for simple fix that can be backported.
>> The more complex generalization of bus address is too much to go to stable branch.

+1

> 
> One idea for backport, perhaps?
> 
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20241119155723.2307189-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com/

ack

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-05  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-01 20:01 [PATCH] eal/common: " Shani Peretz
2024-07-01 22:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-08 16:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Shani Peretz
2024-07-12 13:49   ` David Marchand
2024-07-12 17:55     ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-01-29  8:54   ` [PATCH v4] bus: " Shani Peretz
2025-01-29  9:45     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-29 16:25     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-05 16:36       ` Shani Peretz
2025-02-05 16:42         ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-05 17:37           ` Shani Peretz
2025-02-05 18:46             ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-05 20:16               ` Shani Peretz
2025-01-29 17:17     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-29 18:06       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-02-05  1:55         ` fengchengwen [this message]
2024-10-04 22:21 ` [PATCH] eal/common: " Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62c59ce2-6aab-409f-b44f-6b1faf0eaf2a@huawei.com \
    --to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jblunck@infradead.org \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
    --cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
    --cc=shperetz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tduszynski@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=weh@microsoft.com \
    --cc=xuemingl@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).