DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	Pablo de Lara Guarch <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/table: fix build with GCC 11
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:29:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <635e6994-2234-f97e-9b42-3464374805de@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16891120.zO6uBrY9Ry@thomas>

On 18/05/2021 09:55, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 17/05/2021 17:57, Ferruh Yigit:
>> Build error:
>> ../app/test/test_table_tables.c: In function ‘test_table_stub’:
>> ../app/test/test_table_tables.c:31:9:
>> 	warning: ‘memset’ offset [0, 31] is out of the bounds [0, 0]
>> 	[-Warray-bounds]
>>          memset((uint8_t *)mbuf + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) + 32, 0, 32); \
>>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../app/test/test_table_tables.c:151:25:
>> 	note: in expansion of macro ‘PREPARE_PACKET’
>>   151 |                         PREPARE_PACKET(mbufs[i], 0xadadadad);
>>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> 'key' points to mbuf header + 32 bytes, and memset clears next 32 bytes
>> of 'key', so overall there needs to be 64 bytes after mbuf header.
>> Adding a mbuf size check before memset.
>>
>> The original code has an assumption that mbuf data buffer follows mbuf
>> header, this patch accepts same assumption.
>>
>> Bugzilla ID: 677
>> Fixes: 5205954791cb ("app/test: packet framework unit tests")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
>> Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>>
>> Not exactly clear why compiler complains about, compiler can't know the
>> bounds of the memory we try to memset here.
>> But adding a size check seems logic thing to do also fixes the compiler
>> warning.
> 
> Applied, thanks
> 

Was just testing this. fwiw, passing build on F34/gcc11 and LGTM.

> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 15:57 Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-18  8:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-18  9:29   ` Kevin Traynor [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=635e6994-2234-f97e-9b42-3464374805de@redhat.com \
    --to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).