From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6F22A9 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:09:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n3so8936149wiv.5 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=GXpDphw4OVllw+5l9lmCsEVQyJciYNPaa6mXEE5vxcE=; b=UVcFbXbqW/ryg6C11Tyj85+x9XWPMbqdky9IPCU27QhvxWdQuYz1RegALREPkPyWl7 5zVZolFoQ+fHcrGcJd+jd0AF4EOdEXs+ZnfFNa0v069vJlfeAdLiwMQb0VbrM4BCqK18 XqVIDozabZlvGDB0EXBoKSLQ3xIyR+OvQFrVEFna90PKXh4vHClEd7BhLvfaLWf1hXHo oCB8zYoOSO/sYMo630ePe1q1+Jhc7FXlWSqmZ5kMbXA0bPVORQlvJPD7DdTWpENSutzi THL7b8DkiWa+mhmxLh8tpWvrcgjTHpLtW/Bw9UqXeEmLqV/n/sSgUN2iH+XfleBIfigS 1AyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQme8s+lwDy0VNlWjRMTnVMRFtxKykXHy58ccHLBFUwHjpIdbl2WP9sP3sTflxnqIuAoulL/ X-Received: by 10.180.91.234 with SMTP id ch10mr28834095wib.60.1414505899382; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm2364373wiy.16.2014.10.28.07.18.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:18:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jingjing Wu Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:18:01 +0100 Message-ID: <6372294.ZImQoBpb39@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (Linux/3.17.1-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1413939687-11177-22-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> References: <1411711418-12881-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> <1413939687-11177-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> <1413939687-11177-22-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 21/21] testpmd: add test command to configure flexible masks X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:09:32 -0000 2014-10-22 09:01, Jingjing Wu: > add test command to configure flexible masks for each flow type [...] > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c > + "flow_director_flex_mask (port_id)" > + " flow (ether|ip4|tcp4|udp4|sctp4|ip6|tcp6|udp6|sctp6)" > + " words_mask (words) (word_mask_list)\n" > + " Configure mask of flex payload.\n\n" Does it mean we cannot use it for PPP? or for IP over PPPoE? -- Thomas