DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yang_y_yi  <yang_y_yi@163.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	 "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 "yangyi01@inspur.com" <yangyi01@inspur.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] gso: fix free issue of mbuf gso segments attach to
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:20:38 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <63ac2413.1a02.1753ea89c77.Coremail.yang_y_yi@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB330178813E4F9DC71E5507EA9A020@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

At 2020-10-16 00:16:03, "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 8:06 PM
>> > To: yang_y_yi <yang_y_yi@163.com>; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>
>> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; thomas@monjalon.net;
>> > yangyi01@inspur.com
>> > Subject: RE: Re:RE: [PATCH] gso: fix free issue of mbuf gso segments attach to
>> >
>> >
>> > > From: yang_y_yi <yang_y_yi@163.com>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 3:56 AM
>> > > To: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>
>> > > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
>> > olivier.matz@6wind.com; thomas@monjalon.net;
>> > > yangyi01@inspur.com
>> > > Subject: Re:RE: [PATCH] gso: fix free issue of mbuf gso segments attach to
>> > >
>> > > I think it isn't a good idea to free it in rte_gso_segment, maybe application
>> > will continue to use this pkt for other purpose, rte_gso_segment
>> > > can't make decision for application without any notice, it is better to return
>> > this decision right backt to application.
>> > >
>> >
>> > I think, if user wants to keep original packet, he can always call
>> > rte_pktmbuf_refcnt_update(pkt, 1)
>> > just before calling gso function.
>> >
>> > Also, as I remember in some cases it is not safe to do free() for input packet
>> > (as pkt_out[] can contain input pkt itself). Would it also be user responsibility
>> > to determine
>> > such situations?
>> 
>> In what case will pkt_out[] contain the input pkt? Can you give an example?
>
>As I can read the code, whenever gso code decides that
>no segmentation is not really needed, or it is not capable
>of doing it properly.
>Let say:
>
>gso_tcp4_segment(struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
>                uint16_t gso_size,
>                uint8_t ipid_delta,
>                struct rte_mempool *direct_pool,
>                struct rte_mempool *indirect_pool,
>                struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
>                uint16_t nb_pkts_out)
>{
>	...
>	/* Don't process the fragmented packet */
>        ipv4_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, char *) +
>                        pkt->l2_len);
>        frag_off = rte_be_to_cpu_16(ipv4_hdr->fragment_offset);
>        if (unlikely(IS_FRAGMENTED(frag_off))) {
>                pkts_out[0] = pkt;
>                return 1;
>        }
>
>        /* Don't process the packet without data */
>        hdr_offset = pkt->l2_len + pkt->l3_len + pkt->l4_len;
>        if (unlikely(hdr_offset >= pkt->pkt_len)) {
>                pkts_out[0] = pkt;
>                return 1;
>        }
>
>That's why in rte_gso_segment() we update refcnt only when ret > 1. 
>	
>


This code block 

       if (ret > 1) {
               pkt_seg = pkt;
               while (pkt_seg) {
                       rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(pkt_seg, -1);
                       pkt_seg = pkt_seg->next;
               }
       }

should be equivalent to this

       if (ret > 1) {
               rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
       }

So not sure what the issue you're saying is.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-19  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-10  3:10 yang_y_yi
2020-10-13  7:28 ` Hu, Jiayu
2020-10-13 15:39   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-14  1:00     ` Hu, Jiayu
2020-10-14  2:56       ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-14 12:05         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-15  5:14           ` Hu, Jiayu
2020-10-15 16:16             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-16  0:53               ` Hu, Jiayu
2020-10-16  8:31                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-19  3:17                   ` Hu, Jiayu
2020-10-19  6:44                     ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-19  8:47                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-20  1:16                         ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-19  2:29                 ` yang_y_yi
2020-10-19  2:20               ` yang_y_yi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63ac2413.1a02.1753ea89c77.Coremail.yang_y_yi@163.com \
    --to=yang_y_yi@163.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yangyi01@inspur.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git