From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560B1A2F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:43:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 14 Feb 2017 03:43:46 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,161,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="820731308"
Received: from smonroyx-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.13])
 ([10.237.221.13])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2017 03:43:43 -0800
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
 Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
 deepak.k.jain@intel.com
References: <a1681853-e679-f2d1-c955-04abf1dee60b@nxp.com>
 <2d48b97f-bb39-09e9-5ea2-1fc265459a87@intel.com>
 <ae911a68-af2f-320c-e351-f327031e26f2@nxp.com>
Cc: "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Message-ID: <640d1f93-fb38-711d-2b0e-33c2c6d63ba1@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:43:42 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ae911a68-af2f-320c-e351-f327031e26f2@nxp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] cryptodev - Session and queue pair relationship
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:43:46 -0000

Hi Akhil,

>>
> Thanks for your feedback Declan,
> The suggestion from Fiona looks good. Should I send the patch for this 
> or is it already in discussion in some different thread?
>
> Also, if this new API is added, there would be corresponding change in 
> the ipsec-secgw application as well.

I am looking forward to see those changes in ipsec-secgw.
Mostly I am interesting in seeing how you plan to allocate resources 
(queue_pairs) when having multiple cores/workers.

Regards,
Sergio

> This API should be optional and underlying implementation may or may 
> not implement this API.
>
> Regards,
> Akhil
>
>