From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EC4A0544; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:35:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACA340687; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:35:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD0F40146 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:35:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87D85C00E1; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 03:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Oct 2022 03:35:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1665387344; x= 1665473744; bh=08pNs553SolJ5wY9L12XcK3wEkh7ugxf2oT5XV72aVs=; b=L kwewpMkEHNPeZXaVU9AP7kxRQrsf0Et3uiSkuUMq/RcxyNomTz4CiTCT8u/yTEHQ 9yyHBg8yVokwK8Lq9inDxCqOiStS1+1gVHX/373QnLT1AZ0w5AXDQ058lfDBwFty +B0UF42sLw3KzuMyq78PEgbGvHpC88ZTud3xtTe5atHQnZBAFgCmhKgHS+0JPX08 lZ02Hn6wJ4NxK25YeFeRxt6mgaUHPF8GF53IzHohU2PX2nAt6M/RZHkiLPl7/kJW 6fg2hzFry9PaP7U78VQnbzb9u3sm4kEbEn6bUQRu+e0GlsVZjzr02UW4GCwmrj5G I9Xzhwk+VHaf6WL5Oe3UA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1665387344; x= 1665473744; bh=08pNs553SolJ5wY9L12XcK3wEkh7ugxf2oT5XV72aVs=; b=F znjxWxQtTTrBv7cQ70HtmX1K7o7yAa1Wz5txSWkwzGxyk8aPgZH/iJGlrP13hZzB uNy1ORtFEluQS6Jv8hFa2e2qaAp0Fo986+1V34Z92A2uuNlxW8ibHMQQ3u08fyJD DVYrv7swDcaU7j1EcGDgS7ufSEfhjKZawP9sjOv7D91wzWcxQzimlE2kZZpEaS4T J9b3xxrqMb7DqKai2rxbRuRjL3eD5D3gmPwZfq4DwnHSlUTW3MZANRzsj7ygSXjL f0x8fyXDj8/WHxyAY7qAfvmz4g2M55A3XU97aJhbQXYHjPI3oN5Dds2AB3I5Dnj3 4G3oERMgh8DyM2qC4ldTA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeejfedgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejjefffffgffekfefflefgkeelteejffelledugefhheelffet heevudffudfgvdenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 03:35:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Nicolas Chautru Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" , "trix@redhat.com" , "mdr@ashroe.eu" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "mingshan.zhang@intel.com" , "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" , Akhil Goyal , alialnu@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v12 0/7] bbdev changes for 22.11 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:35:42 +0200 Message-ID: <6431535.tM3a2QDmDi@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1655491040-183649-6-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <20221004171656.17967-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 06/10/2022 19:31, Akhil Goyal: > There were many formatting issues in this patch. This has been a practice in whole of bbdev. > Please take a diff of what is applied on the tree and what was submitted to take care of the > formatting in future patches and please plan to fix the rest of bbdev documentation (API + prog_guide). > > Series applied to dpdk-next-crypto Please could you check this build issue? https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1095 Ideally I'd like to see it fixed today, thanks.