From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441E0A09D9; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:26:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D404137D; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:25:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32325F90 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:25:56 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: XXL9hrXWCeKxalVciuvUQLaVDMoQWJNP5CRs4MkKtL5mE8pmxYUNwXrye0kOBKggT06QaODqV1 7/r8x97ZB9OQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="169354237" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,469,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="169354237" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2020 04:25:53 -0800 IronPort-SDR: Qm+l0xGGvFVqNSCWnWAcYWQqv4t5mpubR5m+v/XJIE3fGENm/Mhjms2Bd3g9b01x1NRxKfHFwM F/LVrAMClL/w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,469,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="323252228" Received: from fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.83]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2020 04:25:53 -0800 Received: from shsmsx603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) by fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:52 -0800 Received: from irsmsx604.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.146.137) by SHSMSX603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:25:49 +0800 Received: from irsmsx604.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.146.137]) by IRSMSX604.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.146.137]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:25:47 +0000 From: "Loftus, Ciara" To: "Dey, Souvik" CC: "Zhang, Qi Z" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: DPDK AF_XDP test results. Thread-Index: Ada3dsy5vsYRkzmeTCCsZyjC07oAEQArRH1Q Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:25:47 +0000 Message-ID: <64ccf4a1ba624d8fad06937cf8bfc119@intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 x-originating-ip: [163.33.253.164] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK AF_XDP test results. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >=20 > Hi All, > There is a test plan for the performance tests of different= scenarios > with AF_XDP in the dpdk docs > https://doc.dpdk.org/dts/test_plans/af_xdp_test_plan.html , but I am not > able to find the test results of the same. Can anyone please help in sha= ring > the results link for these tests. We are starting to look at AF_XDP with = DPDK > and these results will really help us in deciding few points. Also it wil= l be really > appreciated if we have some comparative study of using SR-IOV + DPDK PMD > vs XDP + AF_XDP DPDK PMD. Thanks for the help in this regard. Hi Souvik, I'm not aware of available results either however the plan outlines the ste= ps to gather the results on your own platform if that's a possibility for y= ou? With some small changes comparative tests can be set up for SRIOV. If you choose to run some tests locally I'd be happy to help if you encount= er any issues. Thanks, Ciara >=20 > -- > Thanks, > Souvik