From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E5E8032
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  4 Dec 2014 14:21:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id k14so22399236wgh.23
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 05:21:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=5DTQqlLYwTju2RfmBXvn7szE9YemCS7Iaz3dPgXAQhs=;
 b=mEqPVYMXSb0Uoi4xUw7qXWWE6w+XIZDg1dbA0CY1cdml/8fjy01R9vSB9giOP/VNpH
 zOIoUpSDQfjfHGnOUBLl9CVKR8CcmlV33q7eT0UllmciGM14F6nClRLRkKfRjxd314+Y
 5IQOhG+ge+euIEttnRvxWqf7kMudxORafX4GNGC4FwQ7d5CxN7tFVHUMXTvGlqn7JqVN
 xJjWVZapqwW5j0doTZ/5FOIXhMKLbsRduxsDv46T4ZS/nt6v+d5tVbaOW5K5uHtaPOJw
 J+8I0hJzQ5GKm4KFyd5d8DrgHLP0eQalj+64y2X/QSTEC53fS6zHgTJ8LkkSIoJ9UTi+
 3dAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNr7xlY8bf7WWK5DxXTO80mmDMIMyKiI9JtSfvVtEYjKYGDPM9cS+w1yamf7bd8Q/xuKXW
X-Received: by 10.194.23.10 with SMTP id i10mr15488856wjf.11.1417699268732;
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 05:21:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nj9sm41162722wic.10.2014.12.04.05.21.07
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 05:21:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:20:43 +0100
Message-ID: <6503818.31ZSLaLBbV@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.17.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1417696834-21354-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
References: <1417696834-21354-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: fix memory needs after
	RTE_MAX_LCORE was increased to 128
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:21:09 -0000

> Since commit b91c67e5a693211862aa7dc3b78630b4e856c2af,
> maximum number of cores is 128, which has increase
> the total memory necessary for a rte_mempool structure,
> as the per-lcore local cache has been doubled in size.
> Therefore, eal_flags unit test was broken since it needed
> to use more hugepages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

When I check it in a VM, I still have a memory issue in test_invalid_vdev_flag().
Do you have an idea of the problem?

-- 
Thomas