From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F6541FDE; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5497A40285; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588BF4027B for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1C15C018A; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:34:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:34:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1693496098; x=1693582498; bh=UH64hX1yzb8mWv4uZkMHvX0Te35dunjQdI2 gJUrZoOI=; b=O9MzmaUI0Y/SPPveYDhHiNR8J7NsYGxecabdjWlQngbF6z49xxI sK1QyCEu2Rm/Vba+38Gvzx4iOpfiV9Ci4W2cqQFh3u8KEeKLaajApqu1J0nIZGrl 4Og1OfRjgcUadypwyecgAhpog/PfZfHfmicsMtmDP0SGoGSYTSJPYaYIU0OcAlA3 /lcbRwcLGZynegjpf5aTgN2OlM/zWhUqxoxUxQjs5YVHsXrMSO4fixnXrnotQ2SA 8cZMaVDSZBJD6Fy45UDtGz1tFabdzanRQ1oxw8hBnsOLIPwuuKDbW81xl2H2ltfm XCPTNDUeafiTeYd3/o5VK9m08hX3Dj+s27Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1693496098; x=1693582498; bh=UH64hX1yzb8mWv4uZkMHvX0Te35dunjQdI2 gJUrZoOI=; b=AWkYkElWYb4KqsGWyzJXwSEeVqXBJhaRuDC81IrJt401n8MVntl gRYenIkQEigq+54WTqEggbbZYJT0T2mshJ9ryxbNf16bmhil5OYWHdMfrQ1861iV E+qWrSGOPk0qsM5wDAAc3ldmiU/3t/5TcXLPl4uUsKzapXIdp1NW3r0aoq0I0o5l hDgiuYLTr7MKuCtyebH4GPeZkOGKNWkAzt4dx7YGjDYJzsJ4vRjpcIudwG05LVL4 aNAGvW2jewtsGaEwaA3PZQKfs2cLbDAOfZhExQ+T0zibFfONDDu8JjQ/S77c8DiL Zou3rEVyJzdB3T0Yb5gKgkU7AT9XQ5P0M8g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudegtddgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefhfejleeuvdevtddutdeutdevhfeijeethfffueejhfetuddu vedtkedtieekffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:34:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org, probb@iol.unh.edu, ferruh.yigit@amd.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Release ethdev shared memory on port cleanup Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:34:55 +0200 Message-ID: <6540323.G0QQBjFxQf@thomas> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87B1E@smartserver.smartshare.dk> References: <20230818091321.2404089-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87B1E@smartserver.smartshare.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 18/08/2023 12:18, Morten Br=F8rup: > > From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com] > > Sent: Friday, 18 August 2023 11.13 > >=20 > > This series was triggered after investigating why the > > eal_flags_file_prefix_autotest unit test was failing in the case of > > statically built binaries [1]). > >=20 > > For now, I went with a simple (naive) approach and put all accesses to = the > > shared data under a single lock: ethdev maintainers, it is your turn to > > shine and give me reasons why we should keep the locks the way they > > were ;-). >=20 > This looks like a better solution to me. Perhaps because I'm not an ethde= v maintainer. ;-) Yes Morten, you didn't get the beauty of ethdev complexity :)