DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
@ 2015-02-26  6:33 Raz Amir
  2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-02-26  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
on each device.

Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
 
 #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
 
+#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
+static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
+static int last_detached = 0;
 
 struct nic_uio_softc {
 	device_t        dev_t;
@@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
 		if (dev != NULL)
 			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
 				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
-						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
+						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
+							if (last_detached+1 < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
+								printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
+								detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
+							}
+							else {
+								printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
+									MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
+							}
+								
 							device_detach(dev);
+				}
 	}
 }
 
 static void
 nic_uio_unload(void)
 {
+	int i;
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
+			detached_devices[i]);
+		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
+	}
+
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
  2015-03-01 14:21   ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Neil Horman @ 2015-03-01 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int last_detached = 0;
>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>  	device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>  		if (dev != NULL)
>  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
>  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
> +						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
> +							if (last_detached+1 < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> +								printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
No printfs.  Use the logging facilities

> +								detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> +							}
> +							else {
> +								printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
> +									MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
Dittto

> +							}
> +								
>  							device_detach(dev);
> +				}
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
> +			detached_devices[i]);
> +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
Where is this defined?  It doesn't appear to be in the latest dpdk.

> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.1.2
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
@ 2015-03-01 14:21   ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-01 17:16     ` Neil Horman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-01 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Horman; +Cc: dev

Can you refer me to the logging facilities you are referring to for this
Freebsd driver?
device_probe_and_attach is an API in Freebsd kernel which is called during
boot for finding the relevant driver for each device.
I added manual call to it in the driver unload for re-probing and
re-matching the devices that were detached by the driver.
Before this change, you had to reboot in order to get the devices back.

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] 
Sent: 01 March 2015 15:48
To: Raz Amir
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-probe during driver unload

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int last_detached = 0;
>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>  	device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>  		if (dev != NULL)
>  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
>  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
&&
> -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
devices[i].dev)
> +						pci_get_device(dev) ==
devices[i].dev) {
> +							if (last_detached+1
< MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> +
printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
No printfs.  Use the logging facilities

> +
detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> +							}
> +							else {
> +
printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be
reattached\n",
> +
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
Dittto

> +							}
> +								
>  							device_detach(dev);
> +				}
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
for dev=%p...\n",
> +			detached_devices[i]);
> +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
Where is this defined?  It doesn't appear to be in the latest dpdk.

> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.1.2
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-01 14:21   ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-01 17:16     ` Neil Horman
  2015-03-02  8:18       ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Neil Horman @ 2015-03-01 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Can you refer me to the logging facilities you are referring to for this
> Freebsd driver?
> device_probe_and_attach is an API in Freebsd kernel which is called during
rte_log and friends.

> boot for finding the relevant driver for each device.
> I added manual call to it in the driver unload for re-probing and
> re-matching the devices that were detached by the driver.
> Before this change, you had to reboot in order to get the devices back.
> 
my bad, I didn't see it defined and was thinking it was removed from an earlier
version of the dpdk.
Neil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] 
> Sent: 01 March 2015 15:48
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
> re-probe during driver unload
> 
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> > and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> > on each device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >  
> >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> >  
> > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> > +static int last_detached = 0;
> >  
> >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> >  	device_t        dev_t;
> > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> >  		if (dev != NULL)
> >  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> >  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> &&
> > -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev)
> > +						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev) {
> > +							if (last_detached+1
> < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> No printfs.  Use the logging facilities
> 
> > +
> detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> > +							}
> > +							else {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be
> reattached\n",
> > +
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> Dittto
> 
> > +							}
> > +								
> >  							device_detach(dev);
> > +				}
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> >  nic_uio_unload(void)
> >  {
> > +	int i;
> > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
> for dev=%p...\n",
> > +			detached_devices[i]);
> > +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> Where is this defined?  It doesn't appear to be in the latest dpdk.
> 
> > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int
> > -- 
> > 2.1.2
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-01 17:16     ` Neil Horman
@ 2015-03-02  8:18       ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-02 11:36         ` Neil Horman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-02  8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Horman; +Cc: dev

The patch I suggest is in the nic_uio freebsd kernel driver. I don't think
that rte_log can be used there.
I checked the contigmem freebsd driver and it uses printf.
I can either remove those printfs, or keep them.
I suggest keeping them as they were very helpful for understanding the flow,
and they don't provide too much output (depending on the amount of
interfaces connected to the nic_uio driver).

How should I continue with this patch?
BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1 
Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] 
Sent: 01 March 2015 19:17
To: Raz Amir
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-probe during driver unload

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Can you refer me to the logging facilities you are referring to for 
> this Freebsd driver?
> device_probe_and_attach is an API in Freebsd kernel which is called 
> during
rte_log and friends.

> boot for finding the relevant driver for each device.
> I added manual call to it in the driver unload for re-probing and 
> re-matching the devices that were detached by the driver.
> Before this change, you had to reboot in order to get the devices back.
> 
my bad, I didn't see it defined and was thinking it was removed from an
earlier version of the dpdk.
Neil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: 01 March 2015 15:48
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, 
> and re-probe during driver unload
> 
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >  
> >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> >  
> > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static 
> > +int last_detached = 0;
> >  
> >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> >  	device_t        dev_t;
> > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> >  		if (dev != NULL)
> >  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> >  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> &&
> > -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev)
> > +						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev) {
> > +							if (last_detached+1
> < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev); No 
> printfs.  Use the logging facilities
> 
> > +
> detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> > +							}
> > +							else {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be 
> reattached\n",
> > +
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> Dittto
> 
> > +							}
> > +								
> >  							device_detach(dev);
> > +				}
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> >  nic_uio_unload(void)
> >  {
> > +	int i;
> > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
> for dev=%p...\n",
> > +			detached_devices[i]);
> > +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> Where is this defined?  It doesn't appear to be in the latest dpdk.
> 
> > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int
> > --
> > 2.1.2
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-02  8:18       ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-02 11:36         ` Neil Horman
  2015-03-02 11:58           ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Neil Horman @ 2015-03-02 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:18:42AM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> The patch I suggest is in the nic_uio freebsd kernel driver. I don't think
> that rte_log can be used there.
> I checked the contigmem freebsd driver and it uses printf.
> I can either remove those printfs, or keep them.
> I suggest keeping them as they were very helpful for understanding the flow,
> and they don't provide too much output (depending on the amount of
> interfaces connected to the nic_uio driver).
> 
You're right you can't use it, I thought it was the user space support for the
uio driver, not the kernel module


> How should I continue with this patch?
> BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1 
> Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] 
> Sent: 01 March 2015 19:17
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
> re-probe during driver unload
> 
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Can you refer me to the logging facilities you are referring to for 
> > this Freebsd driver?
> > device_probe_and_attach is an API in Freebsd kernel which is called 
> > during
> rte_log and friends.
> 
> > boot for finding the relevant driver for each device.
> > I added manual call to it in the driver unload for re-probing and 
> > re-matching the devices that were detached by the driver.
> > Before this change, you had to reboot in order to get the devices back.
> > 
> my bad, I didn't see it defined and was thinking it was removed from an
> earlier version of the dpdk.
> Neil
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: 01 March 2015 15:48
> > To: Raz Amir
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, 
> > and re-probe during driver unload
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> > > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> > > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> > > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> > >  
> > >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> > >  
> > > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> > > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static 
> > > +int last_detached = 0;
> > >  
> > >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> > >  	device_t        dev_t;
> > > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> > >  		if (dev != NULL)
> > >  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> > >  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> > &&
> > > -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> > devices[i].dev)
> > > +						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> > devices[i].dev) {
> > > +							if (last_detached+1
> > < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> > > +
> > printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev); No 
> > printfs.  Use the logging facilities
> > 
> > > +
> > detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> > > +							}
> > > +							else {
> > > +
> > printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be 
> > reattached\n",
> > > +
> > MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> > Dittto
> > 
> > > +							}
> > > +								
> > >  							device_detach(dev);
> > > +				}
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void
> > >  nic_uio_unload(void)
> > >  {
> > > +	int i;
> > > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> > > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
> > for dev=%p...\n",
> > > +			detached_devices[i]);
> > > +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> > Where is this defined?  It doesn't appear to be in the latest dpdk.
> > 
> > > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static int
> > > --
> > > 2.1.2
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-02 11:36         ` Neil Horman
@ 2015-03-02 11:58           ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-02 13:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-02 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Thanks.
How should I continue with this patch?
BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1
Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] 
Sent: 02 March 2015 13:37
To: Raz Amir
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-probe during driver unload

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:18:42AM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> The patch I suggest is in the nic_uio freebsd kernel driver. I don't 
> think that rte_log can be used there.
> I checked the contigmem freebsd driver and it uses printf.
> I can either remove those printfs, or keep them.
> I suggest keeping them as they were very helpful for understanding the 
> flow, and they don't provide too much output (depending on the amount 
> of interfaces connected to the nic_uio driver).
> 
You're right you can't use it, I thought it was the user space support for
the uio driver, not the kernel module


> How should I continue with this patch?
> BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1
> Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: 01 March 2015 19:17
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, 
> and re-probe during driver unload
> 
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 04:21:10PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Can you refer me to the logging facilities you are referring to for 
> > this Freebsd driver?
> > device_probe_and_attach is an API in Freebsd kernel which is called 
> > during
> rte_log and friends.
> 
> > boot for finding the relevant driver for each device.
> > I added manual call to it in the driver unload for re-probing and 
> > re-matching the devices that were detached by the driver.
> > Before this change, you had to reboot in order to get the devices back.
> > 
> my bad, I didn't see it defined and was thinking it was removed from 
> an earlier version of the dpdk.
> Neil
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: 01 March 2015 15:48
> > To: Raz Amir
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, 
> > and re-probe during driver unload
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> > > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> > > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> > > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> > >  
> > >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> > >  
> > > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> > > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; 
> > > +static int last_detached = 0;
> > >  
> > >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> > >  	device_t        dev_t;
> > > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> > >  		if (dev != NULL)
> > >  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> > >  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> > &&
> > > -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> > devices[i].dev)
> > > +						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> > devices[i].dev) {
> > > +							if (last_detached+1
> > < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> > > +
> > printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev); No 
> > printfs.  Use the logging facilities
> > 
> > > +
> > detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> > > +							}
> > > +							else {
> > > +
> > printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't 
> > be reattached\n",
> > > +
> > MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> > Dittto
> > 
> > > +							}
> > > +								
> > >  							device_detach(dev);
> > > +				}
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void
> > >  nic_uio_unload(void)
> > >  {
> > > +	int i;
> > > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> > > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
> > for dev=%p...\n",
> > > +			detached_devices[i]);
> > > +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> > Where is this defined?  It doesn't appear to be in the latest dpdk.
> > 
> > > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static int
> > > --
> > > 2.1.2
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-02 11:58           ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-02 13:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
  2015-03-03 11:30               ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-03-02 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

2015-03-02 13:58, Raz Amir:
> BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1
> Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?

It's here: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3800/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-02 13:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2015-03-03 11:30               ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-03 11:45                 ` Bruce Richardson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-03 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dev

Thanks.
What's next with the suggested parch?

On Mar 2, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

2015-03-02 13:58, Raz Amir:
> BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1
> Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?

It's here: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3800/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-03 11:30               ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-03 11:45                 ` Bruce Richardson
  2015-03-03 12:56                   ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-03 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:30:29PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Thanks.
> What's next with the suggested parch?
> 
Hi,

This patch needs to be reviewed and acked before it can be merged. I'll take a 
look at it and test it today, I hope, if nobody else reviews and comments on it
before I get to it.

Regards,
/Bruce

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> 
> 2015-03-02 13:58, Raz Amir:
> > BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
> > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1
> > Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?
> 
> It's here: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3800/
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-03 11:45                 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-03 12:56                   ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-03 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

Thank you

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] 
Sent: 03 March 2015 13:45
To: Raz Amir
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-probe during driver unload

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:30:29PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Thanks.
> What's next with the suggested parch?
> 
Hi,

This patch needs to be reviewed and acked before it can be merged. I'll take
a look at it and test it today, I hope, if nobody else reviews and comments
on it before I get to it.

Regards,
/Bruce

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
wrote:
> 
> 2015-03-02 13:58, Raz Amir:
> > BTW, I don't see it in incoming patches page at
> > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?page=1
> > Is it because I missed something in the code contribution instruction?
> 
> It's here: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3800/
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
  2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
@ 2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
  2015-03-04  9:07   ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-04 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-03 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>

Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me. 

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int last_detached = 0;
Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of "last_detached".

>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>  	device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>  		if (dev != NULL)

We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so maybe flip
this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we can dedent
everything below that follows it.

>  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
>  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
> +						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
> +							if (last_detached+1 < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
I don't think you need the +1 here.

> +								printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> +								detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> +							}
> +							else {
> +								printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
> +									MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> +							}
DPDK coding style is not to put braces around single-line statements like this.


> +								
Remove whitespace from this new line.

>  							device_detach(dev);
> +				}
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
> +			detached_devices[i]);
> +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.1.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-04  9:07   ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-04 10:13     ` Bruce Richardson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-04  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

Thank you.

See answers inline (mostly ack, but not only), and I will send the updated
patch soon.

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]

> Sent: 03 March 2015 15:33

> To: Raz Amir

> Cc: dev@dpdk.org

> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-

> probe during driver unload

> 

> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:

> > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during

> > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and

> > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir < <mailto:razamir22@gmail.com>
razamir22@gmail.com>

> 

> Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me.

> 

> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson < <mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>
bruce.richardson@intel.com>

> > ---

> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26

> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-

> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> >

> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c

> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c

> > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644

> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c

> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c

> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");

> >

> >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)

> >

> > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES               128

> > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static

> > +int last_detached = 0;

> Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of

> "last_detached".

Ack.

 

> 

> >

> >  struct nic_uio_softc {

> >          device_t        dev_t;

> > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)

> >                          if (dev != NULL)

> 

> We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so maybe
flip

> this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we can
dedent

> everything below that follows it.

> 

Ack.

 

> >                                          for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES;
i++)

> >                                                          if
(pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend

> &&

> > -
pci_get_device(dev) ==

> devices[i].dev)

> > +
pci_get_device(dev) ==

> devices[i].dev) {

> > +
if (last_detached+1 <

> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {

> I don't think you need the +1 here.

It is needed, otherwise the last object will be added at
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES position while the last position is
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1.

However, I did change the code to:

if (last_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1) {

to better reflect that.

You will see it in the next patch I will send.

 

> 

> > +

>             printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);

> > +

>             detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;

> > +
}

> > +
else {

> > +

>             printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d.

> dev=%p won't be reattached\n",

> > +

>             MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);

> > +
}

> DPDK coding style is not to put braces around single-line statements like
this.

Ack.

 

> 

> 

> > +

> Remove whitespace from this new line.

> 

Ack.

 

> >
device_detach(dev);

> > +                                                      }

> >          }

> >  }

> >

> >  static void

> >  nic_uio_unload(void)

> >  {

> > +      int i;

> > +      printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");

> > +

> > +      for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {

> > +                      printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to
device_probe_and_attach

> for dev=%p...\n",

> > +                                      detached_devices[i]);

> > +                      device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);

> > +                      printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");

> > +      }

> > +

> > +      printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");

> >  }

> >

> >  static int

> > --

> > 2.1.2

> >

 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-04  9:07   ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-04 10:13     ` Bruce Richardson
  2015-03-04 10:28       ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-04 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Thank you.
> 
> See answers inline (mostly ack, but not only), and I will send the updated
> patch soon.
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> 
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> 
> > Sent: 03 March 2015 15:33
> 
> > To: Raz Amir
> 
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> 
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
> re-
> 
> > probe during driver unload
> 
> > 
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> 
> > > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> 
> > > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and
> 
> > > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir < <mailto:razamir22@gmail.com>
> razamir22@gmail.com>
> 
> > 
> 
> > Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson < <mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> > > ---
> 
> > >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26
> 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> > >
> 
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> 
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> 
> > >
> 
> > > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES               128
> 
> > > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static
> 
> > > +int last_detached = 0;
> 
> > Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of
> 
> > "last_detached".
> 
> Ack.
> 
>  
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> 
> > >          device_t        dev_t;
> 
> > > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> 
> > >                          if (dev != NULL)
> 
> > 
> 
> > We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so maybe
> flip
> 
> > this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we can
> dedent
> 
> > everything below that follows it.
> 
> > 
> 
> Ack.
> 
>  
> 
> > >                                          for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES;
> i++)
> 
> > >                                                          if
> (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> 
> > &&
> 
> > > -
> pci_get_device(dev) ==
> 
> > devices[i].dev)
> 
> > > +
> pci_get_device(dev) ==
> 
> > devices[i].dev) {
> 
> > > +
> if (last_detached+1 <
> 
> > MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> 
> > I don't think you need the +1 here.
> 
> It is needed, otherwise the last object will be added at
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES position while the last position is
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1.

Yes, the last position is MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1, but you do the addition
of the element to the array using "detached_devices[last_detached++]", i.e. a
post-increment, so when last_detached == (MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1), you still
can fill in an entry. Next time around, when last_detached == MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES
it's no longer safe to add, and the condition "last_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES)
will now fail. No +1 or -1 necessary to prevent this.

/Bruce

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-04 10:13     ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-04 10:28       ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-04 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

Understood.
I already sent the updated patch, so I will fix this and resend it soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] 
Sent: 04 March 2015 12:13
To: Raz Amir
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-probe during driver unload

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Thank you.
> 
> See answers inline (mostly ack, but not only), and I will send the 
> updated patch soon.
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> 
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> 
> > Sent: 03 March 2015 15:33
> 
> > To: Raz Amir
> 
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> 
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, 
> > and
> re-
> 
> > probe during driver unload
> 
> > 
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> 
> > > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> 
> > > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and
> 
> > > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir < <mailto:razamir22@gmail.com>
> razamir22@gmail.com>
> 
> > 
> 
> > Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson < <mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> > > ---
> 
> > >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26
> 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> > >
> 
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> 
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> 
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> 
> > >
> 
> > > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES               128
> 
> > > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; 
> > > +static
> 
> > > +int last_detached = 0;
> 
> > Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of
> 
> > "last_detached".
> 
> Ack.
> 
>  
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> 
> > >          device_t        dev_t;
> 
> > > @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> 
> > >                          if (dev != NULL)
> 
> > 
> 
> > We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so 
> > maybe
> flip
> 
> > this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we 
> > can
> dedent
> 
> > everything below that follows it.
> 
> > 
> 
> Ack.
> 
>  
> 
> > >                                          for (i = 0; i < 
> > > NUM_DEVICES;
> i++)
> 
> > >                                                          if
> (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> 
> > &&
> 
> > > -
> pci_get_device(dev) ==
> 
> > devices[i].dev)
> 
> > > +
> pci_get_device(dev) ==
> 
> > devices[i].dev) {
> 
> > > +
> if (last_detached+1 <
> 
> > MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> 
> > I don't think you need the +1 here.
> 
> It is needed, otherwise the last object will be added at 
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES position while the last position is 
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1.

Yes, the last position is MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1, but you do the addition of
the element to the array using "detached_devices[last_detached++]", i.e. a
post-increment, so when last_detached == (MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1), you still
can fill in an entry. Next time around, when last_detached ==
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES it's no longer safe to add, and the condition
"last_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) will now fail. No +1 or -1 necessary
to prevent this.

/Bruce

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
  2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
  2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-04 11:15 ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-09  8:07   ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-04 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Raz Amir
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-04 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
on each device.

Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
index 5ae8560..78e4dea 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
 
 #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
 
+#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
+static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
+static int num_detached = 0;
 
 struct nic_uio_softc {
 	device_t        dev_t;
@@ -289,16 +292,37 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
 
 		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
 		if (dev != NULL)
-			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
-				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
-						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
-							device_detach(dev);
+			continue;
+		
+		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
+			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
+					pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
+						if (num_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
+							printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
+							detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
+						}
+						else
+							printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
+								MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
+						device_detach(dev);
+			}
 	}
 }
 
 static void
 nic_uio_unload(void)
 {
+	int i;
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
+			detached_devices[i]);
+		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
+	}
+
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-03-04 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-04 11:47 ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-05 14:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Raz Amir
  2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-04 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
on each device.

Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
index 5ae8560..077bdb3 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
 
 #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
 
+#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
+static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
+static int num_detached = 0;
 
 struct nic_uio_softc {
 	device_t        dev_t;
@@ -289,16 +292,37 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
 
 		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
 		if (dev != NULL)
-			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
-				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
-						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
-							device_detach(dev);
+			continue;
+		
+		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
+			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
+					pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
+						if (num_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES-1) {
+							printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
+							detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
+						}
+						else
+							printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
+								MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
+						device_detach(dev);
+			}
 	}
 }
 
 static void
 nic_uio_unload(void)
 {
+	int i;
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
+			detached_devices[i]);
+		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
+	}
+
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-03-04 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-05 14:59 ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-05 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
on each device.

Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
index 5ae8560..7a4ed5d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
 
 #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
 
+#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
+static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
+static int num_detached = 0;
 
 struct nic_uio_softc {
 	device_t        dev_t;
@@ -288,17 +291,38 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
 		function = strtol(token, NULL, 10);
 
 		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
-		if (dev != NULL)
-			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
-				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
-						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
-							device_detach(dev);
+		if (dev == NULL)
+			continue;
+		
+		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
+			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
+					pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
+						if (num_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
+							printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
+							detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
+						}
+						else
+							printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
+								MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
+						device_detach(dev);
+			}
 	}
 }
 
 static void
 nic_uio_unload(void)
 {
+	int i;
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
+			detached_devices[i]);
+		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
+	}
+
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-03-05 14:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-11 10:26   ` Bruce Richardson
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-05 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
on each device.

Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
index 5ae8560..7a4ed5d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
 
 #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
 
+#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
+static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
+static int num_detached = 0;
 
 struct nic_uio_softc {
 	device_t        dev_t;
@@ -288,17 +291,38 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
 		function = strtol(token, NULL, 10);
 
 		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
-		if (dev != NULL)
-			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
-				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
-						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
-							device_detach(dev);
+		if (dev == NULL)
+			continue;
+		
+		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
+			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
+					pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
+						if (num_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
+							printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
+							detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
+						}
+						else
+							printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
+								MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
+						device_detach(dev);
+			}
 	}
 }
 
 static void
 nic_uio_unload(void)
 {
+	int i;
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
+			detached_devices[i]);
+		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
+		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
+	}
+
+	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-04 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-09  8:07   ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-09 10:27     ` Bruce Richardson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-09  8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi, gentle reminder about this patch...

On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com> wrote:

Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
on each device.

Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
index 5ae8560..78e4dea 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");

#define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)

+#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES    128
+static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
+static int num_detached = 0;

struct nic_uio_softc {
   device_t        dev_t;
@@ -289,16 +292,37 @@ nic_uio_load(void)

       dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
       if (dev != NULL)
-            for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
-                if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
-                        pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
-                            device_detach(dev);
+            continue;
+        
+        for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
+            if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
+                    pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
+                        if (num_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
+                            printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
+                            detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
+                        }
+                        else
+                            printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
+                                MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
+                        device_detach(dev);
+            }
   }
}

static void
nic_uio_unload(void)
{
+    int i;
+    printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
+
+    for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
+        printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
+            detached_devices[i]);
+        device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
+        printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
+    }
+
+    printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
}

static int
-- 
2.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-09  8:07   ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-09 10:27     ` Bruce Richardson
  2015-03-10  8:15       ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-09 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:07:29AM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Hi, gentle reminder about this patch...
> 
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..78e4dea 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> 
> #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> 
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES    128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int num_detached = 0;
> 
> struct nic_uio_softc {
>    device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -289,16 +292,37 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> 
>        dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
>        if (dev != NULL)
> -            for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> -                if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -                        pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
> -                            device_detach(dev);
> +            continue;
Since we have changed the body to be a continue statement, I think the condition
above needs to be flipped.

/Bruce

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-09 10:27     ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-10  8:15       ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-10  8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

Sorry for that. Will send the new patch soon

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] 
Sent: 09 March 2015 12:28
To: Raz Amir
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe
during driver unload

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:07:29AM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Hi, gentle reminder about this patch...
> 
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 32 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c 
> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..78e4dea 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> 
> #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> 
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES    128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static 
> +int num_detached = 0;
> 
> struct nic_uio_softc {
>    device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -289,16 +292,37 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> 
>        dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
>        if (dev != NULL)
> -            for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> -                if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -                        pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
> -                            device_detach(dev);
> +            continue;
Since we have changed the body to be a continue statement, I think the
condition above needs to be flipped.

/Bruce

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-11 10:26   ` Bruce Richardson
  2015-03-12 12:24     ` Raz Amir
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-11 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7a4ed5d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int num_detached = 0;
>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>  	device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -288,17 +291,38 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>  		function = strtol(token, NULL, 10);
>  
>  		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
> -		if (dev != NULL)
> -			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> -				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
> -							device_detach(dev);
> +		if (dev == NULL)
> +			continue;
> +		
> +		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> +			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> +					pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
> +						if (num_detached < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> +							printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> +							detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
> +						}
> +						else
> +							printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
> +								MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> +						device_detach(dev);
> +			}
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
> +			detached_devices[i]);
> +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.1.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-11 10:26   ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-12 12:24     ` Raz Amir
  2015-03-16 16:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Raz Amir @ 2015-03-12 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

Thank you.
Can you tell when will the patch be pushed to the source code?

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] 
Sent: 11 March 2015 12:26
To: Raz Amir
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and
re-probe during driver unload

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 34 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c 
> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7a4ed5d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static 
> +int num_detached = 0;
>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>  	device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -288,17 +291,38 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>  		function = strtol(token, NULL, 10);
>  
>  		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
> -		if (dev != NULL)
> -			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> -				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
&&
> -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
devices[i].dev)
> -							device_detach(dev);
> +		if (dev == NULL)
> +			continue;
> +		
> +		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> +			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> +					pci_get_device(dev) ==
devices[i].dev) {
> +						if (num_detached <
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> +
printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> +
detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
> +						}
> +						else
> +
printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be
reattached\n",
> +
MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> +						device_detach(dev);
> +			}
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
for dev=%p...\n",
> +			detached_devices[i]);
> +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> --
> 2.1.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-12 12:24     ` Raz Amir
@ 2015-03-16 16:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
  2015-07-08 22:51         ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-03-16 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir; +Cc: dev

Hi,

2015-03-12 14:24, Raz Amir:
> Thank you.
> Can you tell when will the patch be pushed to the source code?

This is changing the behaviour. I think we should keep it for 2.1 and check if
some docs must be updated in the meantime.
Then we should look at general behaviour for binding/unbinding devices in DPDK.
I feel it would be better to have a common behaviour with BSD, Linux UIO,
Linux VFIO, etc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] 
> Sent: 11 March 2015 12:26
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and
> re-probe during driver unload
> 
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 34 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c 
> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > index 5ae8560..7a4ed5d 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >  
> >  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> >  
> > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static 
> > +int num_detached = 0;
> >  
> >  struct nic_uio_softc {
> >  	device_t        dev_t;
> > @@ -288,17 +291,38 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> >  		function = strtol(token, NULL, 10);
> >  
> >  		dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
> > -		if (dev != NULL)
> > -			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> > -				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> &&
> > -						pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev)
> > -							device_detach(dev);
> > +		if (dev == NULL)
> > +			continue;
> > +		
> > +		for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> > +			if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> > +					pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev) {
> > +						if (num_detached <
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> > +
> detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
> > +						}
> > +						else
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be
> reattached\n",
> > +
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> > +						device_detach(dev);
> > +			}
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> >  nic_uio_unload(void)
> >  {
> > +	int i;
> > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
> > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
> for dev=%p...\n",
> > +			detached_devices[i]);
> > +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> > +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int
> > --
> > 2.1.2
> > 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
  2015-03-16 16:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2015-07-08 22:51         ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-07-08 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Raz Amir, Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

This patch received no more comment about a common BSD/Linux behaviour.
Maybe that some documentation is needed.

2015-03-16 17:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> Hi,
> 
> 2015-03-12 14:24, Raz Amir:
> > Thank you.
> > Can you tell when will the patch be pushed to the source code?
> 
> This is changing the behaviour. I think we should keep it for 2.1 and check if
> some docs must be updated in the meantime.
> Then we should look at general behaviour for binding/unbinding devices in DPDK.
> I feel it would be better to have a common behaviour with BSD, Linux UIO,
> Linux VFIO, etc.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] 
> > Sent: 11 March 2015 12:26
> > To: Raz Amir
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and
> > re-probe during driver unload
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> > > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during 
> > > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and 
> > > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Applied, thanks

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-08 22:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-26  6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload Raz Amir
2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-01 14:21   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-01 17:16     ` Neil Horman
2015-03-02  8:18       ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 11:36         ` Neil Horman
2015-03-02 11:58           ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 13:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-03 11:30               ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 11:45                 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-03 12:56                   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04  9:07   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 10:13     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 10:28       ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
2015-03-09  8:07   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-09 10:27     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-10  8:15       ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 14:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-11 10:26   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-12 12:24     ` Raz Amir
2015-03-16 16:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 22:51         ` Thomas Monjalon

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git