From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501448DB5 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:25:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 15:25:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,272,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="816735213" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 15:25:42 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx155.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.71) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:25:41 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.71]) by FMSMSX155.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.231]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:25:40 -0800 From: "Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C" To: Aaron Conole Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/10] Add installation rules for dpdk files Thread-Index: AQHRG9vsClQdcDvHsUqsUs9xGmdHQJ6V5ixe Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:25:39 +0000 Message-ID: <6594B51DBE477C48AAE23675314E6C460F77F334@fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1442608390-12537-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> <1447175260-26162-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.19.9.42] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Venegas Munoz, Jos C" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/10] Add installation rules for dpdk files X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:25:45 -0000 Hi Aaron,=0A= =0A= =0A= I have been working on series of patches in order to improve =0A= the installation process of dpdk, I sent my first version at =0A= sep 18.=0A= =0A= http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023761.html=0A= =0A= I have been received feedback from different developers as=0A= Olivier, Bruce, Panu etc... and I have been taking note about it=0A= and I have been improving the patches in each serie, at this=0A= moment I haven't gotten a final answer, however I'm going to continue=0A= working. :)=0A= =0A= Mario.=0A= Thanks.=0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Aaron Conole [aconole@redhat.com]=0A= Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 9:18 AM=0A= To: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C=0A= Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Venegas Munoz, Jos C; Richardson, Bruce=0A= Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/10] Add installation rules for dpdk fi= les=0A= =0A= Hi Mario,=0A= =0A= Mario Carrillo writes:=0A= > DPDK package lacks of a mechanism to install libraries, headers=0A= > applications, kernel modules and sdk files to a file system tree.=0A= > This patch set allows to install files based on the next=0A= > proposal:=0A= > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/file-hierarchy.html=0A= =0A= I'm not sure what this patch holds, given the following proposal:=0A= =0A= http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-November/027777.html=0A= =0A= -Aaron=0A=