From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA74E8D99 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:36:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2015 11:36:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,370,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="5689415" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2015 11:36:11 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx122.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.37) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 11:36:10 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.71]) by fmsmsx122.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.219]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 11:36:10 -0800 From: "Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add installation rules for dpdk files. Thread-Index: AQHRK9KonADNgbshgUu5aJDqmDhmLJ63CEMA//99gAA= Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:36:09 +0000 Message-ID: <6594B51DBE477C48AAE23675314E6C460F784605@fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1442608390-12537-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> <1448931205-17357-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com>, <2719219.0ADflfCWst@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2719219.0ADflfCWst@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.19.9.46] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Venegas Munoz, Jos C" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/11] Add installation rules for dpdk files. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 19:36:49 -0000 Hi Thomas,=0A= =0A= Thank you for your answer, John Mcnamara gave feedback about documentation = in this version (7) and I'm going to send a version number 8 with new chang= es =0A= about documentation, it would be amazing if you could take a look it :) th= ank you for your attention. =0A= =0A= Mario. =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Thomas Monjalon [thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]=0A= Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 11:17 AM=0A= To: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C=0A= Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; miguel.bernal.marin@linux.intel.c= om; Venegas Munoz, Jos C; Richardson, Bruce; david.marchand@6wind.com=0A= Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add installation rules for dpdk files.=0A= =0A= Hi Mario,=0A= =0A= Thanks for your work. There are some interesting ideas :)=0A= I'm going to send a patchset to establish the same kind of=0A= rules keeping the old install behaviour and allowing a=0A= standard one with the same name (install).=0A= The result would be closed to what pkg/dpdk.spec provides.=0A= Your review would be appreciated.=0A=