From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4C1468BF; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1138402D4; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.155]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1752540299; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.phl.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440802540172; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 03:29:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Jun 2025 03:29:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1749540568; x=1749626968; bh=GkobRODaNru8uPR+3yQFiAN4pe/2l3KbpYeLOaYlEsY=; b= K8fnvKUaJNoF0MxqyhD6fsltyZRKK5fIHTKEcUr29e7FYjVLk2WbjH0AcFoN+SMi WwfbCMczwy24zQKSG72ilqMyBH8o3c71H2u0HrtlsMrmVbf5p45qGhZiG01r2YcA 5OdIqhuR29GbWbe5WHqo/eESYRYk71lUHMLl7a/UlKmcxELqvVm9yVtZ/cqF3DBF h2wpLm41758QG7PhgRrWLuAQHLGWp20PNcH21wga8Cx5QZ2lQWGFCVE3mQPKXkTr OTNZScegZcLq1sNQ8+oVCd1LDo7OoOKGV0H7OcypcK8xpHfxYUVEEXpY3ehjMmwL rF0QTDYO7RPcX0/TM0UpIw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1749540568; x= 1749626968; bh=GkobRODaNru8uPR+3yQFiAN4pe/2l3KbpYeLOaYlEsY=; b=l Kfxpc9hSnMjHxHhLvv23WbgGOVFp4+AzkJlhoNHo1iz9kJ4xWJZCNkabAbEb/65i CeE+ANT6LY2PxBU8r1PhvMqUH0kj+kUeZnW0UMjPhukEpldOHAC2jxcJhJ7EOau+ geF30KaX6yzy7vg2umBb/lZQoraVX/jH+9Kv+N2jJr+ekGkmkS3bwJktl4gFfbiE bYOGZfyWbZ9oTElY2duJy97goYSDIPgTHzoZGGJST4onJjbpB2f/P2ESox8r1dqk 6OhP79NQvnB7jQkRqpmOE50R3LYcwCzld3asplEFTVz04n3sVfgKIi5MkWDJ4RVy MtkJhrMCpVG/BPnx1hAZA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugddutdegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttdej necuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjh grlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefheeftdegtdejheeuuedtgfel feeiveekieekleekffelgfdtveeiheehffdunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrgh enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgepsh hmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehrjhgrrhhrhiesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtohepuggvvhesughpughkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtvghphhgvnhesnhgvth ifohhrkhhplhhumhgsvghrrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtrggslhgvseguphgukhdr ohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsuhhnnhihlhgrnhguhhesghhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 03:29:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Robin Jarry Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , stable@dpdk.org, Junxiao Shi Subject: Re: [PATCH dpdk] net: fix IPv4 compat and mapped checks Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: <6595105.Wku2Vz74k6@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20250224144725.271975-2-rjarry@redhat.com> References: <20250224144725.271975-2-rjarry@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 24/02/2025 15:47, Robin Jarry: > The RFC states that the first 96 bits should be compared, not the first > 32 bits. > > Add unit tests to ensure this works. > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Fixes: 3d6d85f58c1c ("net: add utilities for well known IPv6 address types") > Reported-by: Junxiao Shi > Closes: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1664 > Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry Common format in DPDK is: Bugzilla ID: 1664 Fixes: 3d6d85f58c1c ("net: add utilities for well known IPv6 address types") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Applied, thanks.