From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE181B498; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 01:49:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AF421FED; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:49:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:49:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=wV9ufC+oeMQkpndkP9M9MC5cjrhXymHWJKJJmfzq5Ac=; b=q4dNmzzWYJC6 TjTs8Xd+ryeg0OLbffQUQY1L9s0evulPB0QGspiYnmHK8+seGRYPDxUdg8hJ/RUU euw6lbi8nYiCl8iu8sCyQYiuAPoaPbRuOAjajJ8nEUKeCjhOJNL1emiZ4cL9qN1O /LLGY4vikwNIR36zUFUGfkcUGZ8pb+M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=wV9ufC+oeMQkpndkP9M9MC5cjrhXymHWJKJJmfzq5 Ac=; b=Fw/WqH6U6HB/TNkYnck9aEtJ6VlZ7Z+3DJoz4png6ybAbQ/mrX3+Q6JbI wcAnhm3RBR6zDqVmG+CIfzGXYWncZiWWCy9UmrY6q+SkjBZiKh7PXkefmi89Aw3E 5pTuMpaGWhDE2oPIiXmqAvj+eZ7DlD2FmRNI/vLv2opThV28i00twMEICj6rTORL /wH8TQBLZGyfFwW2Ba/VGmLTHU2wrNw1Z3iRkmvyJyFF8mHCKLmO9GkjWnYabbVg bGzhy3/KkC0+jaxekKuAAvoEaMlZf6l7B4YS89mKO1/cj48J7VRcutC+vmvGhMyq X/yHnrcs/deXOnNVdjjt83WwTXuBw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8E6A3102ED; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:49:55 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Joyce Kong Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" , "gavin.hu@arm.com" , "nd@arm.com" , "stable@dpdk.org" Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 01:49:54 +0100 Message-ID: <67085532.1IpMzPZPNf@xps> In-Reply-To: <20181122110359.GA14060@jerin> References: <1542870074-142423-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com> <1542872227-143453-1-git-send-email-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20181122110359.GA14060@jerin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] config: enable more than 128 cores for Arm64 platform X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 00:49:57 -0000 22/11/2018 12:04, Jerin Jacob: > From: Joyce Kong > > > > When running dpdk applications on cores whose ids are bigger > > than original max_core setting, eal error as below: > > EAL: Detected 104 lcore(s) > > EAL: Detected 2 NUMA nodes > > EAL: invalid core list > > -l CORELIST core indexes between 0 and 128 > > > > The fix is to increase max_core to 256 on Arm64 platform. > > > > Fixes: b3ce00e5 ("mk: introduce ARMv8 architecture") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Applied, thanks Note: Arm64 replace by arm64 to comply with Honnappa's naming recommendation.