From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB4F9E3 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:27:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id t79so200319072wmt.0 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:27:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KciGOKLKC6+AbwLJhAU6vcHdxCd9S3QSjorm/F4IzEQ=; b=oi9WT1VXEBXRtfHw01IMQCglDWfeRe5pkVNfsZ2nHdPakBq37sGE2no1JvVZprXkbI yy7OvN3wH+qgGLFh+iJduF2a5oxhA5ireMxCfctjeUBg81ynp/mo18suu1pQO3zK95nF FYPzE302k3G02U75Go85Xl7LXk1KFEwyEzSCgKygq5/I+mu3DrO1DmEJIe7FELPTVJTS WT/3R9QGWqobHQRssAbaj2KNkhpMcAYRcBhp9AO/RJ1O9/xr/zhThnG5Sh9WHUosBktX E4yaegtpA8j7TC7WIr9QqhNogz9wkbLpioie3KAxBC/Ds9pkZPenX48iYpjn7ATIuPw+ W8Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KciGOKLKC6+AbwLJhAU6vcHdxCd9S3QSjorm/F4IzEQ=; b=B8Oeflkgbr03qaQow4b0xOKT7QDbIS3e6q4kOYTEvDZSNr2eLFiaZeAfygSHgZM/3q 8Zi3XowhxjD7xz+Gt6rCCU9XkOO2f2dyRlxH9cFlQImB/B7qGF9NDaCw5K/7U7KRiMu8 rDcZdYOKmeCUXN0Iya217bqYhocfxQYGz/uGbXCqGeT2f7nPzV3aklf9e7du8P/V1ozc NIYWd6kCVeWMbF0kKB8RsVkl60pna6HaqdAiF4dx5KVl5qPnIS/qQI/TOCCVyC7x+BDC em7pOlAfjapPTaq6qqAIYr9le4VicT0cn21UyV9XPmAivg6gDQMbD9jfSfMftVOaG4vj 1VTw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvekTst1ne3cO25FcB4dP3Gvqr8ozr9Ug4gldPcHL+zDyEHyHUbdBLZmQ7hBPJOOOMI2 X-Received: by 10.28.184.74 with SMTP id i71mr8449169wmf.49.1478550465365; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s133sm15495089wmd.19.2016.11.07.12.27.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:27:44 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Wenzhuo Lu Cc: dev@dpdk.org, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:27:43 +0100 Message-ID: <67229791.hG439HiJFh@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1478452574-127074-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> References: <1478452574-127074-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/ip_frag: fix IP reassembly not working issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:27:45 -0000 2016-11-06 12:16, Wenzhuo Lu: > After changing pkt[0] to pkt[], the example IP reassembly is not > working. > It's weird because this change is fine. There should be no > difference between them. > As a workaround, revert this change. > > Fixes: 347a1e037fd3 (lib: use C99 syntax for zero-size arrays) > > Reported-by: Huilong Xu > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu Applied, thanks Please keep us informed if you understand the issue.