From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329ADA04B6; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:51:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D121B872; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EC22952 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:51:54 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: P0OUkv4l7kTXPjEL77clbk1wA6eQQwxAInUJYBPOj15QQwGgN23P5j0jvQa8JZzECX3oQKG/0K ChJURDFreX3A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9772"; a="153700325" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,369,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="153700325" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2020 00:51:53 -0700 IronPort-SDR: iNXZNXmDNYv91mKFAeZkgzpxN3PC1MVDLf6qUnPfQY1OAGgH+Kqt8VnWhMMXZXOIl33+5HDgqC hTzsfX6OqhBA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,369,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="520953831" Received: from fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.86]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2020 00:51:53 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:51:52 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:51:50 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:51:50 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Guo, Junfeng" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Xing, Beilei" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] net/ice: refactor RSS config for potential bugs Thread-Index: AQHWoSoImdxh0IW+xkmQsAcPWFWo/qmVJjdA Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:51:50 +0000 Message-ID: <6763c1102f2c41ffafe85fddcf33697f@intel.com> References: <20201012075404.1727593-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> <20201013062555.1120324-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201013062555.1120324-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ice: refactor RSS config for potential bugs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Guo, Junfeng > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:26 PM > To: Zhang, Qi Z ; Wu, Jingjing ; > Xing, Beilei > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Junfeng > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/ice: refactor RSS config for potential bugs Renamed to refactor RSS config wrap and fix potential bugs >=20 > Current implementation for PF RSS config wrap function has some potential > bugs about GTPU, e.g., same input set for GTPU inner and non-TUN have > different hash values, which should be same. Thus, we use extra pre and p= ost > processing to re-config GTPU rules. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel with fixline be added Added fix line: Fixes: 185fe122f489 ("net/ice: fix GTPU down/uplink and ex= tension conflict") Thanks Qi