From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lrp0020.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF305593E for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.142) by AMSPR06MB088.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1005.10; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:10 +0000 Received: from AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.148]) by AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.148]) with mapi id 15.00.1005.008; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:10 +0000 From: Ilan Borenshtein To: "Wu, Jingjing" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Signature filter for virtual function Thread-Index: Ac+3u2ouJ7b6cNiXT4+k2JCaYR6AgwAoZ+aQAGO51bAAJAhAoAAN24FwADMBsHAAAQ+6oA== Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:09 +0000 Message-ID: <67bb9b241243465497c8aae410bc25ee@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> References: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD8DA4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <735e767ffc77477ab517319407651172@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD91C6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <7241f60d228f4a4dae39ed26f316d81c@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD9AAA@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD9AAA@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [62.219.196.223] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0308EE423E x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019006)(6009001)(199003)(377454003)(13464003)(164054003)(51704005)(189002)(79102001)(80022001)(95666004)(106356001)(76576001)(66066001)(33646002)(74502001)(81542001)(74662001)(76482001)(64706001)(105586002)(99396002)(20776003)(74316001)(77982001)(76176999)(2656002)(54356999)(107886001)(81342001)(21056001)(50986999)(31966008)(85852003)(46102001)(83072002)(4396001)(107046002)(92566001)(108616004)(83322001)(93886004)(101416001)(85306004)(87936001)(19580395003)(77096002)(19580405001)(86362001)(2501001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR06MB088; H:AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: asocstech.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:04:45 -0000 Yes, 82599. I'll be updated. Thank you for your answer. -----Original Message----- From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:41 AM To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function Are you talking about 82599? I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be vol= unteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are eager t= o contribute to it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF. > Will it be implemented in future releases ? >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or=20 > director packet to different queue in a VF? >=20 > For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using,=20 > the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try). > But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different= Rx queues by a VF ? > > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ilan B > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hi > > > > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan=20 > > > Borenshtein > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using=20 > > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ilan B