From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D4BB36B for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2014 01:24:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,839,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="583068690" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.36]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2014 01:24:02 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 01:24:02 -0700 Received: from bgsmsx151.gar.corp.intel.com (10.224.48.42) by fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 01:24:02 -0700 Received: from bgsmsx102.gar.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.29]) by BGSMSX151.gar.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:53:59 +0530 From: "Ramia, Kannan Babu" To: "Zhang, Helin" , "Wodkowski, PawelX" Thread-Topic: SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration Thread-Index: Ac+1OFzBKtAM5KBZTo6WNfSE2w/DtQAA4ldgAABNFmA= Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:23:58 +0000 Message-ID: <682698A055A0F44AA47192B20141149711AFC09E@BGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.223.10.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:21:14 -0000 Only if you enable DCB option you will get the multiple queues per VF. regards Kannan Babu -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 1:44 PM To: Wodkowski, PawelX Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wodkowski, PawelX > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 4:05 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration >=20 > Hi, > I am wondering if there is a sense in having different configuration=20 > in for RX and TX mode in SR-IOV mode. Ex RX mode ETH_MQ_RX_NONE and TX=20 > mode ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_DCB or something similar. > I am asking because in code there is no difference between number of=20 > RX queues and TX queues reported to VF and if having different=20 > configuration in RX and TX is possible this must be taken into account. > Pawe=B3 W=F3dkowski > Sii Engineer > Delivering outsourced services to Intel Hi Pawel Though I am not sure if understood your question, I am trying to give some = comments. Do you mean the configurable number of rx/tx queues in VF? For Niantic, har= dware just supports only one queue in VF, so there is no flexibility for th= at. For later NICs like i40e, we will have that flexibility. Regards, Helin