From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC74311F5 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:58:29 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2018 09:58:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,427,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="180055280" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.62]) ([10.237.221.62]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2018 09:58:27 -0800 To: "Rosen, Rami" , "dev@dpdk.org" Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" , Liang Ma , Peter Mccarthy References: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F94C401373@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <685f7b21-c36c-9896-36c7-c781e2390fb7@intel.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:58:26 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F94C401373@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:58:30 -0000 On 2/9/2018 12:08 AM, Rosen, Rami wrote: > Hi all, > Following the recent announcement of DPDK 18.02-RC4, I went over > 18.02 release notes and I have this minor query which I am not sure about: > In the release notes: > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.html > we have the following: > ... > The OPDL (Ordered Packet Distribution Library) eventdev > ... > > While in http://dpdk.org/dev/roadmap > We have: > .... > eventdev optimized packet distribution library (OPDL) driver > ... > > So I am not sure about this inconsistency -should it be "optimized" or "ordered" ? According driver documentation (doc/guides/eventdevs/opdl.rst) it is: "Ordered Packet Distribution Library", release notes seems correct. cc'ed maintainers. > > Regards, > Rami Rosen > >