From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7309E4C96 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:15:04 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Nov 2018 04:15:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,483,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="278458941" Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.143]) ([10.237.220.143]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2018 04:15:01 -0800 To: "tone.zhang" , dev@dpdk.org Cc: gavin.hu@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, Steve.Capper@arm.com, nd@arm.com References: <1540347604-18590-1-git-send-email-tone.zhang@arm.com> <1541743077-27994-1-git-send-email-tone.zhang@arm.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <68c31d94-3e4d-7b03-209b-1e63c564aa74@intel.com> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:15:00 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1541743077-27994-1-git-send-email-tone.zhang@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] pci_vfio: Support 64KB kernel page_size with vfio-pci driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:15:05 -0000 On 09-Nov-18 5:57 AM, tone.zhang wrote: > With a larger PAGE_SIZE it is possible for the MSI table to very > close to the end of the BAR s.t. when we align the start and end > of the MSI table to the PAGE_SIZE, the end offset of the MSI > table is out of the PCI BAR boundary. > > This patch addresses the issue by comparing both the start and the > end offset of the MSI table with the BAR size, and skip the mapping > if it is out of Bar scope. > > The patch fixes the debug log as below: > EAL: Skipping BAR0 > > Signed-off-by: tone.zhang > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Reviewed-by: Steve Capper > Reviewed-by: Burakov Anatoly In the future, please don't include my Reviewed tag unless i actually sent one :) > --- > drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c > index 305cc06..9a0affe 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c > @@ -445,9 +445,11 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res, > struct pci_msix_table *msix_table = &vfio_res->msix_table; > struct pci_map *bar = &vfio_res->maps[bar_index]; > > - if (bar->size == 0) > + if (bar->size == 0) { > /* Skip this BAR */ > + RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Skipping BAR%d\n", bar_index); > return 0; > + } > > if (msix_table->bar_index == bar_index) { > /* > @@ -456,8 +458,22 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res, > */ > uint32_t table_start = msix_table->offset; > uint32_t table_end = table_start + msix_table->size; > - table_end = (table_end + ~PAGE_MASK) & PAGE_MASK; > - table_start &= PAGE_MASK; > + table_end = RTE_ALIGN(table_end, PAGE_SIZE); > + table_start = RTE_ALIGN(table_start, PAGE_SIZE); > + /* after rounding to PAGE_SIZE, it is over the bar->size, > + * fall back to the MSI-X table offset in the bar and > + * align with PAGE_SIZE. > + */ Minor nitpick - wording of comment could be better, for example: if page-aligned start of MSI-X table is beyond BAR size, shrink the mapping size to MSI-X table start address. Also, probably needs newline before comment. > + if (table_start >= bar->size) { > + table_start = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(msix_table->offset, > + PAGE_SIZE); > + /* after aligning with PAGE_SIZE, if it is less than > + * the MSI-X table offset, continue falling back to > + * the actual MSI-X table offset in the bar. > + */ Same here, wording could probably be improved. Suggested rewording: If MSI-X table address, floor-aligned by page size, is lower than actual MSI-X table offset, fall back to using MSI-X table offset as table start. Now that i think of it, this could really be expressed like this: uint32_t aligned = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(msix_table->offset, PAGE_SIZE); table_start = RTE_MAX(aligned, msix_table_offset); I believe this would be much clearer. > + if (table_start < msix_table->offset) > + table_start = msix_table->offset; > + } > > if (table_start == 0 && table_end >= bar->size) { > /* Cannot map this BAR */ > @@ -469,8 +485,18 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res, > > memreg[0].offset = bar->offset; > memreg[0].size = table_start; > - memreg[1].offset = bar->offset + table_end; > - memreg[1].size = bar->size - table_end; > + if (bar->size < table_end) { > + /* > + * after rounding to PAGE_SIZE we don't have any space > + * left after the MSI table, so don't try and map it. > + */ Suggested rewording: If MSI-X table end is beyond BAR end, don't attempt to perform second mapping. > + memreg[1].offset = 0; > + memreg[1].size = 0; > + } > + else { > + memreg[1].offset = bar->offset + table_end; > + memreg[1].size = bar->size - table_end; > + } > > RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, > "Trying to map BAR%d that contains the MSI-X " > However, the patch can go in as is if needed, so Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov -- Thanks, Anatoly