DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/mlx5: fix Rx checksum macros
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2016 11:39:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6911f305d5657741c238c173424c671333110d08.1478082521.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1478082521.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1478082521.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>

Add missing:

 - MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV4_PACKET
 - MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV6_PACKET
 - MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV4_PACKET
 - MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV6_PACKET
 - MLX5_CQE_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET
 - MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IP_CSUM_OK
 - MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_TCP_UDP_CSUM_OK

Fixes: 51a50a3d9b8f ("net/mlx5: add definitions for data path without Verbs")

Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h  | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h
index 90b47f0..500f25a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h
@@ -84,6 +84,27 @@
 #define MLX5_OPCODE_TSO MLX5_OPCODE_LSO_MPW /* Compat with OFED 3.3. */
 #endif
 
+/* IPv4 packet. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV4_PACKET (1u << 2)
+
+/* IPv6 packet. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV6_PACKET (1u << 3)
+
+/* Outer IPv4 packet. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV4_PACKET (1u << 7)
+
+/* Outer IPv6 packet. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV6_PACKET (1u << 8)
+
+/* Tunnel packet bit in the CQE. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET (1u << 4)
+
+/* Outer IP checksum OK. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IP_CSUM_OK (1u << 5)
+
+/* Outer UDP header and checksum OK. */
+#define MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_TCP_UDP_CSUM_OK (1u << 6)
+
 /* Subset of struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg. */
 struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg_small {
 	uint32_t rsvd0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
index ba8e202..7ebe557 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
@@ -1096,19 +1096,19 @@ rxq_cq_to_pkt_type(volatile struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe)
 	uint8_t flags = cqe->l4_hdr_type_etc;
 	uint8_t info = cqe->rsvd0[0];
 
-	if (info & IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET)
+	if (info & MLX5_CQE_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET)
 		pkt_type =
 			TRANSPOSE(flags,
-				  IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_OUTER_IPV4_PACKET,
+				  MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV4_PACKET,
 				  RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4) |
 			TRANSPOSE(flags,
-				  IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_OUTER_IPV6_PACKET,
+				  MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV6_PACKET,
 				  RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6) |
 			TRANSPOSE(flags,
-				  IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_IPV4_PACKET,
+				  MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV4_PACKET,
 				  RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4) |
 			TRANSPOSE(flags,
-				  IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_IPV6_PACKET,
+				  MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV6_PACKET,
 				  RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV6);
 	else
 		pkt_type =
@@ -1256,13 +1256,13 @@ rxq_cq_to_ol_flags(struct rxq *rxq, volatile struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe)
 	 * of PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD because the latter is not functional
 	 * (its value is 0).
 	 */
-	if ((info & IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET) && (rxq->csum_l2tun))
+	if ((info & MLX5_CQE_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET) && (rxq->csum_l2tun))
 		ol_flags |=
 			TRANSPOSE(~cqe->l4_hdr_type_etc,
-				  IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_OUTER_IP_CSUM_OK,
+				  MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IP_CSUM_OK,
 				  PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD) |
 			TRANSPOSE(~cqe->l4_hdr_type_etc,
-				  IBV_EXP_CQ_RX_OUTER_TCP_UDP_CSUM_OK,
+				  MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_TCP_UDP_CSUM_OK,
 				  PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD);
 	return ol_flags;
 }
-- 
2.1.4

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-02 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-02 10:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fix Rx checksum offloads Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-11-02 10:39 ` Nelio Laranjeiro [this message]
2016-11-02 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/mlx5: define explicit fields for Rx offloads Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-11-02 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx: fix support for new Rx checksum flags Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-11-02 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fix Rx checksum offloads Adrien Mazarguil
2016-11-07 17:42   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6911f305d5657741c238c173424c671333110d08.1478082521.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --to=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).