From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C62C22 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 06:29:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2016 21:29:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,549,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="61114050" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2016 21:29:45 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 21:29:45 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.232]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:29:43 +0800 From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" To: "Wu, Jingjing" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] lib/librte_ether: support new l2 tunnel operation Thread-Index: AQHReCGBjsJwrul9EE+XyWbIHM9sp59NdBSg Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 05:29:43 +0000 Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909034384B5@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1454051035-25757-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1457318568-28797-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1457318568-28797-6-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DCF2EC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DCF2EC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] lib/librte_ether: support new l2 tunnel operation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 05:29:47 -0000 Hi Jingjing, >=20 > How about to merge the above six APIs > rte_eth_dev_l2_tunnel_XXX_enable/disable > to one, may call rte_eth_dev_l2_tunnel_offload_set? > Just like the rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_offload. Good suggestion. I'll do it. >=20 >=20 > Pool is used here, but vf_id is used above. Suggest to put such arguments= into > structure, maybe in l2_tunnel. Agree, seems better. I'll send a new version. >=20 > Thanks > Jingjing