From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A145A29 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:21:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2017 19:21:16 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,348,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="52277934" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2017 19:21:16 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:21:16 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.88]) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:21:14 +0800 From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" To: Vincent JARDIN , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Zhang, Helin" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "'JOSHI, KAUSTUBH'" , "'DANIELS, EDWARD'" , "'ZELEZNIAK, ALEX'" , "Chen, Jing D" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/25] Support VFD on i40e Thread-Index: AQHSaxF4WHHhY20890iFxNKWG121aaExLWSAgAB1FwCAABNQgIABBx6AgAFulsA= Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 03:21:13 +0000 Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B5587BF@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480637533-37425-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1484032580-60134-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1598a0c7f80.27fc.bb328046f2889bc8f44aafa891a44dd2@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/25] Support VFD on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 03:21:18 -0000 Hi Vincent, > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent JARDIN [mailto:vincent.jardin@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 9:14 PM > To: Yigit, Ferruh; Zhang, Helin; Lu, Wenzhuo; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: 'JOSHI, KAUSTUBH'; 'DANIELS, EDWARD'; 'ZELEZNIAK, ALEX' > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/25] Support VFD on i40e >=20 > Le 10/01/2017 =E0 22:32, Ferruh Yigit a =E9crit : > > What do you think to continue high level DPDK PF discussion in mail > > thread for other pathset? So that we can continue to work on this one. >=20 > First, we need to assess or not if it makes sense to go toward Linux kern= el or > DPDK based PF. If Linux kernel is used, then DPDK does not need VFD relat= ed > modifications. >=20 > VFD demonstrates that there are some needs of features, but it pushes the > new path of a fork of PF drivers. We're not sure if we want to change and maintain a totally new DPDK PF eith= er.=20 So, we only change PMD code and not expose it to abstraction layer. It can = only be used by some users who have the needs.=20 It's experimental and comes from the users' requirement. If it's good enoug= h and accepted by other NICs, we can expose it.=20 If it's not good, it still can be a choice before Linux kernel provides.