DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] Recommended LNS-compatible host interface?
@ 2014-08-05 15:36 Finucane, Stephen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Finucane, Stephen @ 2014-08-05 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi,

DPDK supports a number of different interface types. Given this, at this time what is the favoured (virtual) interface type for host-only applications where Linux network stack compatibility is required? Previously we used KNI (we found this to be "unreliable" when not bound to a real ethdev). Is this still the best option?

Cheers,
Stephen

PS: The reliability issues we saw were related to ARP. Manually adding an ARP entry caused the entire board to lock up (i.e. hard reboot necessary). At the time, we got around this by not using ARP as we didn't really need it. However, this likely won't be possible going into the future.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-08-05 15:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-05 15:36 [dpdk-dev] Recommended LNS-compatible host interface? Finucane, Stephen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).