From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE68333 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 02:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2014 17:41:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,592,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="608176872" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2014 17:47:48 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:47:48 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:47:47 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.203]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.192]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:47:46 +0800 From: "Fu, JingguoX" To: "Ouyang, Changchun" , Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd Thread-Index: AQHP2AOQT4CaeA2+7U2wzS7y7ylLFJwRA7eA Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:47:45 +0000 Message-ID: <6BD6202160B55B409D42329311582262548504@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1408006475-17606-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <6BD6202160B55B409D423293115822625483B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <2446963.gpRyEul7fH@xps13> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:41:35 -0000 Hi Thomas, Ouyang is right! Yes, I had finished the patch validation, so I reply the email, thanks. Regards, Jingguo Fu -----Original Message----- From: Ouyang, Changchun=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 22:27 To: Thomas Monjalon; Fu, JingguoX Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ouyang, Changchun Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virt= io pmd Hi Thomas, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:32 PM > To: Fu, JingguoX > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in vi= rtio > pmd >=20 > Hi Jingguo, >=20 > 2014-09-24 09:22, Fu, JingguoX: > > Tested-by: Jingguo Fu > > > > This patch includes 1 files, and has been tested by Intel. > > Please see information as the following: > > > > Host: > > Fedora 19 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.9.0, GCC 4.8.2 Intel Xeon CPU > > E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz > > NIC: Intel Niantic 82599, Intel i350, Intel 82580 and Intel 82576 > > > > Guest: > > Fedora 16 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.4.2, GCC 4.6.3 Qemu emulator 1.4.2 > > > > This patch tests with user space vhost driver library patch. > > We verified zero copy and one copy test cases for functional and > performance. > > > > This patch depend on the two patches: > > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Update max RX packet length > > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005107.html > > [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: Fix vring entry number issue > > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005170.html >=20 > This patch and the previous one (Support jumbo frame in user space vhost) > were part of release 1.7.1. > You already sent an email about this test: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-July/004466.html > So I'm not sure it deserves another email today. >=20 As I know, Jingguo was trying to verify more cases (such as jumbo frame for= ward between VM to VM ) with this v3 patch, I think he finish all test cases today, so send this mail. And I think he also validate these 2 patches in his recent validation work: http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005107.html http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005170.html jingguo, am I correct? Thanks and regards, Changchun