Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow action PORT ID semantics

[Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>]

On 6/8/21 7:13 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 07/06/2021 18:07, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 07/06/2021 15:21, Ilya Maximets:
>>> On 6/7/21 2:08 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
>>>> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>> On 6/7/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>>>> I see emails don't work well to conclude on how to manage representors.
>>>>>> I propose working in live meetings so we can try to align our views on
>>>>>> a virtual whiteboard and interactively ask questions.
>>>>>> Participants in those meetings could work on documenting what is the
>>>>>> view of a representor as a first step.
>>>>>> Second step, it should be easier to discuss the API.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you agree, I will plan a first meeting where we can discuss what is
>>>>>> a representor in our opinions.
>>>>>> The meeting time would be 4pm UTC.
>>>>>> For the day, I would propose this Thursday 10 if it works for
>>>>>> everybody involved.
>>>
>>> Second half of the day (CET) is pretty much booked in my calendar.  Tuesday
>>> or Wednesday might work on this week.  Wednesday or Thursday might work on
>>> next week.
>>>
>>>>> OK for me.
>>>> O.K. for me too.
>>
>> OK let's decide with a poll please:
>> https://framadate.org/PAP3t8ycqx3lEUfe
> 
> Only 5 people voting.
> We will be at least 4 tomorrow Wednesday 3pm UTC.
> Everybody is welcome to join the community meeting:
> 	https://zoom.us/j/93391811485

Invite has July, 7. Typo?

> We could try another session on Thursday 4pm UTC if needed.
> 	https://zoom.us/j/92425132629
> 
> Note: we will use Zoom which offers a whiteboard.
>