DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 15957197901  <15957197901@163.com>
To: "Maxime Coquelin" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] vhost: Fix the crash caused by accessing the released memory
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:49:00 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e23d3c6.6b3e.1938b4784f9.Coremail.15957197901@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a43b1af-cab5-4ce9-b0b0-e5d8e7e18af6@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2539 bytes --]

Hello Maxime Coquelin,




The scenario where I encountered coredump was ovs-dpdk,

similar to patch: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/52d874dc67055a943867456d3e5c730168bfba18.

Only one thread called rte_vhost_driver_unregister(), but at the same time, 

two other threads called vhost_user_read_cb() and vhost_user_client_reconnect() respectively.




The specific reasons for coredump are as follows:

vhostuser port is created as client.

Thread 1 calls rte_vhost_driver_unregister() to remove the vsocket of reconn from the reconn list.

then “vhost-events” thread calls vhost_user_read_cb() to add the vsocket of reconn back to the reconn list.
At this time, after thread 1 releases the vsocket memory, the socket of vhostuser reconnects successfully, 
"vhost_reconn" thread will access the released memory.
Therefore, The fix is to perform a delete operation again after releasing the memory.



I have resubmitted the patch, please review it again.

https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240625093149.63247-1-15957197901@163.com/







At 2024-06-24 17:20:00, "Maxime Coquelin" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 6/19/24 14:27, zhaoxinxin wrote:
>> The rte_vhost_driver_unregister() vhost_user_read_cb()
>> vhost_user_client_reconnect() can be called at the same time by 3 threads.
>> when memory of vsocket is freed in rte_vhost_driver_unregister(),
>> then vhost_user_read_cb() maybe add vsocket to reconn_list,
>> the invalid memory of vsocket is accessed in vhost_user_client_reconnect().
>
>It is not clear to me why 3 threads are calling
>rte_vhost_driver_unregister() at the same time, isn't it an application
>issue?
>
>> The core trace is:
>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>> The fix is to perform a delete operation again after releasing the memory
>>
>
>We need a Fixes tag and Cc stable@dpdk.org so that it is backported.
>
>> Signed-off-by: zhaoxinxin <15957197901@163.com>
>
>The format is Firstname Lastname <email>
>
>
>> ---
>>   lib/vhost/socket.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/lib/vhost/socket.c b/lib/vhost/socket.c
>> index a75728a2e4..01946096c4 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/socket.c
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/socket.c
>> @@ -1121,6 +1121,8 @@ rte_vhost_driver_unregister(const char *path)
>>   		if (vsocket->is_server) {
>>   			close(vsocket->socket_fd);
>>   			unlink(path);
>> +		} else if (vsocket->reconnect) {
>> +			vhost_user_remove_reconnect(vsocket);
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		pthread_mutex_destroy(&vsocket->conn_mutex);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4764 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-04  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19 12:27 zhaoxinxin
2024-06-24  9:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2024-06-25  1:56   ` 15957197901
2024-12-03  6:49   ` 15957197901 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e23d3c6.6b3e.1938b4784f9.Coremail.15957197901@163.com \
    --to=15957197901@163.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).