From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: chas3@att.com, xudingke@huawei.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix slave tx burst for mode 4
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:34:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f80e7f3-6d6c-e2e6-861d-d57795c0289c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549872096-16116-1-git-send-email-wangyunjian@huawei.com>
How strange. I was just looking at this issue this weekend. I think
we can just move the control packet handling before the data packet
handling. That avoids the goto and is a little more sensible -- we should
try to prioritize control traffic (even if we can't guarantee there will
be space it's better than nothing). Something like this:
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
index 44deaf119..89ad67266 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
@@ -1298,9 +1298,6 @@ bond_ethdev_tx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct
rte_mbuf **bufs,
uint16_t i;
- if (unlikely(nb_bufs == 0))
- return 0;
-
/* Copy slave list to protect against slave up/down changes during tx
* bursting */
slave_count = internals->active_slave_count;
@@ -1310,6 +1307,30 @@ bond_ethdev_tx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct
rte_mbuf **bufs,
memcpy(slave_port_ids, internals->active_slaves,
sizeof(slave_port_ids[0]) * slave_count);
+ /* Check for LACP control packets and send if available */
+ for (i = 0; i < slave_count; i++) {
+ struct port *port = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[slave_port_ids[i]];
+ struct rte_mbuf *ctrl_pkt = NULL;
+
+ if (likely(rte_ring_empty(port->tx_ring)))
+ continue;
+
+ if (rte_ring_dequeue(port->tx_ring,
+ (void **)&ctrl_pkt) != -ENOENT) {
+ slave_tx_count = rte_eth_tx_burst(slave_port_ids[i],
+ bd_tx_q->queue_id, &ctrl_pkt, 1);
+ /*
+ * re-enqueue LAG control plane packets to buffering
+ * ring if transmission fails so the packet isn't lost.
+ */
+ if (slave_tx_count != 1)
+ rte_ring_enqueue(port->tx_ring, ctrl_pkt);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(nb_bufs == 0))
+ return 0;
+
dist_slave_count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < slave_count; i++) {
struct port *port = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[slave_port_ids[i]];
@@ -1365,27 +1386,6 @@ bond_ethdev_tx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct
rte_mbuf **bufs,
}
}
- /* Check for LACP control packets and send if available */
- for (i = 0; i < slave_count; i++) {
- struct port *port = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[slave_port_ids[i]];
- struct rte_mbuf *ctrl_pkt = NULL;
-
- if (likely(rte_ring_empty(port->tx_ring)))
- continue;
-
- if (rte_ring_dequeue(port->tx_ring,
- (void **)&ctrl_pkt) != -ENOENT) {
- slave_tx_count = rte_eth_tx_burst(slave_port_ids[i],
- bd_tx_q->queue_id, &ctrl_pkt, 1);
- /*
- * re-enqueue LAG control plane packets to buffering
- * ring if transmission fails so the packet isn't lost.
- */
- if (slave_tx_count != 1)
- rte_ring_enqueue(port->tx_ring, ctrl_pkt);
- }
- }
-
return total_tx_count;
}
On 2/11/19 3:01 AM, wangyunjian wrote:
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>
> Now sending 0 packet it doesn't consider for LACPDUs,
> but the LACPDUs should be checked and sended.
>
> Fixes: 09150784a776 ("net/bonding: burst mode hash calculation")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Reported-by: Hui Zhao <zhaohui8@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> index 44deaf1..a77af19 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> @@ -1298,9 +1298,6 @@ struct bwg_slave {
>
> uint16_t i;
>
> - if (unlikely(nb_bufs == 0))
> - return 0;
> -
> /* Copy slave list to protect against slave up/down changes during tx
> * bursting */
> slave_count = internals->active_slave_count;
> @@ -1310,6 +1307,9 @@ struct bwg_slave {
> memcpy(slave_port_ids, internals->active_slaves,
> sizeof(slave_port_ids[0]) * slave_count);
>
> + if (unlikely(nb_bufs == 0))
> + goto lacp_send;
> +
> dist_slave_count = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < slave_count; i++) {
> struct port *port = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[slave_port_ids[i]];
> @@ -1365,6 +1365,7 @@ struct bwg_slave {
> }
> }
>
> +lacp_send:
> /* Check for LACP control packets and send if available */
> for (i = 0; i < slave_count; i++) {
> struct port *port = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[slave_port_ids[i]];
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 8:01 wangyunjian
2019-02-11 15:34 ` Chas Williams [this message]
2019-02-12 2:04 ` wangyunjian
2019-02-14 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Chas Williams
2019-02-18 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f80e7f3-6d6c-e2e6-861d-d57795c0289c@gmail.com \
--to=3chas3@gmail.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wangyunjian@huawei.com \
--cc=xudingke@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).