-             printf("Error: Source or destination numa exceeds the acture numa nodes.\n");
+             printf("Error: %s numa exceeds the available numa nodes.\n",
+                             (cfg->src_numa_node >= nr_sockets) ? "Source" : "Destination");

Thank you for comments, please find my reasoning as `change is added to address spelling issue of acture numa to available numa`

There are three cases to invoking:
1) src_numa_node >= nr_sockets
2) dst_numa_node >= nr_sockets
3) both src_numa_node and dst_numa_node >= nr_sockets

As per my testing, following scenarios are explored

1) if src-numa is incorrect, we get error message as `source is incorrect numa`

2) if dst-numa is incorrect, we get error message as `destination is incorrect numa`

3) if both src-numa and dst-numa are incorrect, we get error as `source is incorrect numa`, fixing source and rerunning `destination is incorrect numa` (which is expected)


It could cover cases 1&2 in your commit, but could not cover case 3.

I am happy to make changes to reflect the third scenario also. But please note as shared, the real intention is to fix ` acture numa` to something meaningful.

So I think we should keep original implement.

I humbly disagree, based on the explanation as shared above. I can share v2 patch to address

1. acture numa

2. soruce or destination or src & destination