DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/af_xdp: fix unchecked return of recvfrom()
@ 2021-03-25  8:22 Ciara Loftus
  2021-03-30 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ciara Loftus @ 2021-03-25  8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: Ciara Loftus

Coverity complains that the return value of recvfrom() in the AF_XDP
datapath is not checked. We don't care about the return value because in
the case of an error we still return 0 from the receive function to
indicate no packets were received. So to make Coverity happy we cast the
return to 'void'.

Coverity issue: 369671
Fixes: 63e8989fe5a4 ("net/af_xdp: use recvfrom instead of poll syscall")

Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
index a64fef1cf5..6e44a21c64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ af_xdp_rx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
 
 	if (nb_pkts == 0) {
 		if (syscall_needed(&rxq->fq, rxq->busy_budget))
-			recvfrom(xsk_socket__fd(rxq->xsk), NULL, 0,
+			(void)recvfrom(xsk_socket__fd(rxq->xsk), NULL, 0,
 				MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, NULL);
 
 		return 0;
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ af_xdp_rx_cp(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
 	if (nb_pkts == 0) {
 #if defined(XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP)
 		if (xsk_ring_prod__needs_wakeup(fq))
-			recvfrom(xsk_socket__fd(rxq->xsk), NULL, 0,
+			(void)recvfrom(xsk_socket__fd(rxq->xsk), NULL, 0,
 				MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, NULL);
 #endif
 		return 0;
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/af_xdp: fix unchecked return of recvfrom()
  2021-03-25  8:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/af_xdp: fix unchecked return of recvfrom() Ciara Loftus
@ 2021-03-30 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-03-30 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ciara Loftus, dev

On 3/25/2021 8:22 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> Coverity complains that the return value of recvfrom() in the AF_XDP
> datapath is not checked. We don't care about the return value because in
> the case of an error we still return 0 from the receive function to
> indicate no packets were received. So to make Coverity happy we cast the
> return to 'void'.
> 
> Coverity issue: 369671
> Fixes: 63e8989fe5a4 ("net/af_xdp: use recvfrom instead of poll syscall")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-30 13:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-25  8:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/af_xdp: fix unchecked return of recvfrom() Ciara Loftus
2021-03-30 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).